English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Personally, I’d be an 8.5 or 9 because I’m just a little bit superstitious. I don’t like seeing the moon rise red and my new years eves always suck for some reason. Neither science nor logic can explain this so I remain incomplete in my atheism. But I vehemently reject the possibility of an afterlife and the bible to me is a load of primitive, meaningless, nonsense stories.

2007-08-15 12:37:51 · 16 answers · asked by Desiree 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

16 answers

10. There is no God, no afterlife, no miracles, no heaven, no hell.

2007-08-15 12:44:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

10

2007-08-15 12:49:44 · answer #2 · answered by . 6 · 1 0

10

2007-08-15 12:45:19 · answer #3 · answered by superwow_rl 5 · 2 1

10

2007-08-15 12:44:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

20

2007-08-15 12:45:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Probably about a 3, actually. I'm only an atheist on a technicality, which is that I don't believe deities are real.

I am, however, a pagan Taoist with many abstract spiritual beliefs.

I generally answer atheist questions, though, because I do technically qualify, and I have many things in common with logical atheists, such as a general disdain for organized religion and a desire to keep religion out of schools and government.

2007-08-15 12:51:19 · answer #6 · answered by KC 7 · 1 1

properly, some human beings on listed under are extraordinarily reliable whilst it contains political debate. They act like expert, mature debaters who stick up for his or her own perspectives on an identical time as being respectful to others. yet on the different hand, many human beings do not something yet whine and cry and ignorantly provide their opinions on themes they recognize not something approximately. Many conservatives at right here do not something yet call liberals evil godless socialists and a superb type of liberals at right here do not something yet call conservatives fascist staggering winged religious nut jobs... ordinary, i could provide Y!A a severe 4 or a low 5 because of the fact I do provide a superb type of credit to the folk who do put in some attempt in giving advice and answering inquiries to the excellent of their potential.

2016-12-15 16:23:33 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Probably a 10.

I will never believe in a Christian God or any of the other gods of any of the organized religions.

I do not believe in a Creator or other god that guides the universe or a universal consciousness.

I suspect we have much to learn about our selves and how we interact with one another and the world which I see as a larger organism.

We might discover something real in the realm of paranormal, but I suspect it is all bullshit.

2007-08-15 13:00:34 · answer #8 · answered by Zarathustra 2 · 2 2

Shouldn't there be two numbers, sort of technical merit and artistic interpretation?

I'm well up on "the knowledge"
(theology, history, cosmology, geology, biological sciences...)
but I'm well behind some of the more vituperative iconoclasts on the Dawkins scale of active opposition.

Combined score 8.5?

2007-08-15 12:58:26 · answer #9 · answered by Pedestal 42 7 · 1 1

Are we using the Richter Magnitude Scale here? Should one quake with fear for being called an aethiest? Or were we created as inherently suspicious beings?

2007-08-15 12:50:05 · answer #10 · answered by Ward 3 · 0 0

I'm probably a 10. I don't believe in anything supernatural and adamantly reject any religion. It's all just crap to me. I do acknowledge that there is a lot that we don't undertand (obviously).

2007-08-15 12:47:30 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers