English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Sice this lady is suing Imus and stating it is because he called her a Ho and it ruined her rep, I just want to know why she isnt suing the REAL person who said the term Ho. I heard the radio broadcast on CNN when all this hit the fan in the first place and I heard someone say they were a bunch of Ho's and then a bunch of laughing and then Imus said, "yeah a bunch of nappy headed hos" in all the hubbub about this i have not heard of anyone else getting in trouble about the ho comment, i had always assumed the real outrage was over them being called "nappy-headed" due to the fact it was "racist" or whatever. I mean honestly had they all been white and blonde and he called them dumb blonds there wouldnt have been a problem now would there have been?

2007-08-15 10:44:31 · 2 answers · asked by effie r 2 in Society & Culture Etiquette

2 answers

Not really. But a nappy headed is more hurtful than ho. In my opinion. Who cares. Imus is a old hateful man.

2007-08-15 11:06:12 · answer #1 · answered by bugginthug 1 · 1 0

It was Don Imus who said it. I don't know what kind of trouble there would have been if he called white woman dumb blondes, but it is completely horrible to refer to college women who are black as "nappy haired hoes."

As far as the law-suit, I don't agree with that either, but there you go - nothing good comes of name calling.

2007-08-15 12:57:12 · answer #2 · answered by Patti C 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers