English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

That according to Ohio State University and the Byrd Polar Research Center; the worlds most dramatic climate change occurred world wide @5500 years ago at the time of the Noahitic flood. This based on samples taken from drilling through ice core glaciers.
And "OetzI' the frozen man found by hikers in 1991 is around 5500 years old. Mammoths are frozen in water. Fossils are made by "sudden" sedimentation.

2007-08-15 10:20:54 · 13 answers · asked by Who's got my back? 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

13 answers

Creationist here!!! I know you are on to something...... Absolutely not a coincidence.

2007-08-15 10:26:25 · answer #1 · answered by ♥Sunny Girl♥ 5 · 3 3

Link or source info on the worldwide flood, from Ohio State University and the Byrd Polar Research Center pls.

This has the smell of something barnyardlike

2007-08-15 17:40:44 · answer #2 · answered by Jack P 7 · 0 1

Is it also coincidence that the oldest tree in the world is a Bristlecone Pine located in Cal. that is 4400 yrs old. Or that the Great Barrier Reef is 4300 yrs old. Or that the Sahara Desert can only be 4000 yrs old and gaining ground every year? So much evidence and so little thirst for the Truth! If the earth is so much older, why aren't there older specimens around?

2007-08-15 17:31:17 · answer #3 · answered by michael m 5 · 2 0

I bet neither the Ohio State University nor the Byrd Polar Research Center drew the same conclusions.

If you are going to use someone else research then you might as well use THEIR conclusions.

2007-08-15 17:26:36 · answer #4 · answered by Dark-River 6 · 2 2

According to Harvard Medical School, citing research without links means nothing.

See what I did there?

To: emo_nic, The lack of a citation was the point.

2007-08-15 17:25:19 · answer #5 · answered by Lynus 4 · 1 1

What is this drivel? If you're going to cite "facts" give us the provenance, evidence, or at least a link. I suspect your attribution of "Noahitic" is spurious too, a desperation for interpreting findings to support your already established conviction of Biblical veracity and accuracy.

Augh! There are so many holes in this... try some objective thinking, pal!

2007-08-15 17:32:29 · answer #6 · answered by Tyler's Mate 4 · 0 2

What a shame that we have several continuous historical records though this period that totally fail to mention that they need to stop writing while everyone drowns.


But then I suspect that you see a lot more information than is really there and ignore the facts that do not meet your preconceptions.

2007-08-15 17:39:39 · answer #7 · answered by Simon T 7 · 0 1

Yeah....and it took billions of years to carve out the Grand Canyons and they find fish fossils there...Ummm...not a coinkadink at all I think. Love in Christ, ~J~

2007-08-15 17:27:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Was that dramatic climate change more rain?

2007-08-15 17:28:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

um good job lynus but you had no sites to claim your research either

2007-08-15 17:29:28 · answer #10 · answered by emo_nic 1 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers