I hate the pople that think their theories of animal cruelty are correct. they think dog fighting is simalar to hunting? How stupid! Deer arent gambled upon and forced to kill each other! Deer are overpopulated and will eventaully starve to death if we dont hunt them, and they eat so many crops, they can ruin the yeild of one field for a year. Two years ago, my family had a 110 acre field that made less than a 65 acre field because of animals eating the corn! Coyotes and foxes are mangy animals that bother pets, and can bother livestock. I dont care how cute and cudly you think they are, let me know and i will hapily trap one, and throw it in my truck, bring it to your door step and show you excatly what i mean! Have you ever seen a squirrel in a foot trap? I caught one accidentally a year ago and it would have chewed my foot off if i let it, yet they are cute and cuddly furry little animals.
Anyone else have the same views?
2007-08-15 10:04:07 · 18 answers · asked by Aaron 4 in Sports ➔ Outdoor Recreation ➔ Hunting
Agree %100. People like that need to have their own separate section, and stay out of the hunting section. They have the right to express their opinion, but not here, where they have no clue what they are talking about. Those people are the reasons why some people think that hunters and trappers are irresponsible, drunk, crazy morons that go out into the woods and shoot everything in sight, which is not true and a lack of knowledge on their part.
2007-08-15 10:58:43 · answer #1 · answered by T.Long 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
All these different sections seem to have a love/hate thing going. Anti-hunting gets just about as bad as Atheist Vs Christian or religion under Religion and Spirituality.
I don't force my views on anyone and try not to troll or pick fights. I don't like what they are saying either. Just don't come onto our property trying to cause a problem especially during hunting season.
We wont be able to get any of them to see things our way nor will they change out minds. Most people on answers wouldn't talk face to face with a stranger like sometimes happens on answers. Anonymity is their safety net so what flies outta the keyboard is much more venomous.
Bet they haven't changed any ones mind here!
2007-08-15 17:44:28 · answer #2 · answered by Ret. Sgt. 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
i amen that and also what would happen if no one hunted deer or any other legal animal for that matter the deer would just make insurence rates go up and their are already enough as it is. In NC if a anti bothers you while you are hunting and will not stop you can contact the local authorities and they can get a $1,000 fine and 30 days in jail
2007-08-16 12:04:59 · answer #3 · answered by joseph c 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
totally agree.I am so sick of these idiots.It would be different if they presented a reasonable argument on why disagree (like we do) but they just whine that anyone who hunts is a sicko because they said so.Hopefully one day most of the people of earth will evolve to the point where all the PETA ******* live in a forest with all the animals where we can hunt them as well.lol
2007-08-15 12:43:16 · answer #4 · answered by HM 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
There lonely little people that have no life or respect for others.
They need to get a hug-a-bunny forum so they can cry some where else.
They are the substance that comes out of the north end, of a south bound horse.
D58
Hunting with Rifle, Pistol, Muzzle loader and Bow for over 3 decades.
Reloading Rifle, Pistol and shotgun for over 3 decades.
2007-08-15 14:59:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
What the hell do I know. I was dumb enough to post question about "not hunting makes you gay?", knowing it would cause a rucus with the gays and peta "cruisers".
I do stuff like that all the time just to give them something to bellyache about in hopes of distracting them from the real objecitve of the hunting forum which is WORLD DOMINATION!
2007-08-15 12:03:03 · answer #6 · answered by coolhandven 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
It's the price we pay for living in a free country.
2007-08-15 10:45:56 · answer #7 · answered by DJ 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I agree with you, but there is this thing called "freedom of speech", so they can say pretty much anything they want. They think that by saying the things they say, it will make us change our minds about hunting. Animals were made to serve man, not vice versa. They have this reversed, in their sick little minds, and think they will get everyone to convert. They don't realize that most of us who hunt aren't animal haters, and we do it for the survival of the species. Mostly, they are just full of crap.
2007-08-15 13:12:45 · answer #8 · answered by esugrad97 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The just like to jerk our chain. They are not interested in an answer and probably do not even read the answers. It is a form of harassement to them. They will never change their minds just because you write a logical and truthful answer. I just don't answer them. If all of us just ignored their questions they would stop filling our catagory up with ignorance and hate.
2007-08-15 10:57:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Do you know the difference between anti-hunting bambi lovers and puppie dogs? Sooner or later the puppies quit whining.
2007-08-15 11:35:00 · answer #10 · answered by acmeraven 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋