non-descriptive question headers?
2007-08-15 09:59:02 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
willhobe: thanks.
2007-08-15 10:10:57 · update #1
Some times, that's the only way we have around the CG. We try to ask a complete question, correctly phrased, and have it deleted, and get a violation notice. We really want to ask that question, you know ;) so we do exactly what you said you hate. :) Can't you, instead, love us, for being creative and non-conformists? Please?? ;)
2007-08-15 10:28:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 0⤋
Lol! I only clicked on this one because it was you. I trusted it would be worth it; it was.
And yes, people, you need strong openings! Get the main gist of a question in the header and you'll get more answers.
2007-08-15 10:09:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Really burns my A ss!
..and another thing that really burns my A ss is having to become creative, in spelling commonly used terms, in order to get a question or answer passed the neo-puritan child-protective nanny patrol.
Regards Padre,
M
2007-08-15 10:14:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-08-15 10:06:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I hate deceptive question headers more.
2007-08-15 10:21:46 · answer #5 · answered by Starjumper the R&S Cow 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I sure do. I also hate questions where I am not given enough information to answer the question properly.
2007-08-15 10:07:27 · answer #6 · answered by geniepiper 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
As long as you're getting some header, it can't be all that bad. ;)
2007-08-15 10:20:19 · answer #7 · answered by Jack B, sinistral 5 · 7⤊ 0⤋
Sure yea, I hate the life because there is questions like this one.
2007-08-15 10:10:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Q.E.D. A perfect demonstration of an ignoble practice.
2007-08-15 10:09:48 · answer #9 · answered by skepsis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I thought this was a valid question without the additional details.
2007-08-15 10:08:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋