starting so many!!
Best anwer wins a copy of the Koran.
2007-08-15 08:58:54 · 20 answers · asked by Britsruletheworld 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
We have a little thing called Geneva convention look it up. second for u to say something that ridiculous it shows how stupid u are about ur own country's history!!! so why are the British so stupid and ***** about their coffee so much, o yeah cuz when it comes to a war all you snobs come running to jump behind Americans, and say "we British are such cowards help us well get our *** kicked help us "and because were Americans we do shut ur mouth u British asshole . British rule the world yeah right we fight all ur wars for you, so you dont get ur panzy a$$'s kicked
2007-08-15 10:32:48 · answer #1 · answered by dloc 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Maybe the reason the British are being attacked by those who read the Koran is because they are not pro-active but rather wait for the sh1t to hit the fan before they respond.
And by the way, I have British blood - but it doesn't mean I like the way the British became tyrants over the Irish - I also have Irish blood.
So why did the Brits take over parts of Ireland that wasn't theirs to begin with? Greed?
Did you ever hear about World Wars I and II? How about the American Revolution?
Why have we continued to help you fight your war against terrorism when this is the thank you we get? Maybe you should battle your war by yourself? Let the soldiers do their jobs and learn to read your history before you post such nonsense.
2007-08-15 16:07:00 · answer #2 · answered by Naturescent 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Speaking of being bad at war... How many times have the Brits had the hats handed to them in the last 100 years?
Yeah... You rule the world alright. But then you wake up and your sheets are wet.
Give me a break. We are STILL cleaning up the mess your country made in the Middle East. You do know the Brits started this whole mess don't you? Probably not. You don't seem that bright.
2007-08-15 16:06:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
The US doesnt ***** about wars, people who value or democratic system do, and they use it in the way that it is menat to be used.
BTW, the US is quite good at fighting wars. Iraq and Vietnam were both very large conflicts that involved a large amount of "assymetrical" warfare (guerilla warfare), which means tactics that the US military is not designed to counter.
However, despite this ineptitude for counter-geurilla tactics, we still kick quite a lot of @ss. The death toll in Iraq and Vietnam basically states that the Insurgents and Viet Cong both were cannon fodder.
2007-08-15 16:52:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If I remember correctly....yes that's right there was a little thing called the American Revolution. Didn't a bunch of farmers whip your army? My bad I must have Alzheimer's. And wasn't there a couple of world wars that America had to go over to Europe to help with? I probably am remembering wrong.
2007-08-15 16:04:30 · answer #5 · answered by tsugamoto 2 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like your doing the *$(#)#ing here. I do not know exactly what you mean. Sure we have started a FEW wars, but if you want to compare it to how many Islam has started then you win! Islam started and finished more wars than the US, Islam burned more libraries and books, Deystroyed more cities and so on. Thanks for clearing that up for me, now I am not as ashamed of GW Bush.
2007-08-15 16:06:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, I was just a kid during World War II, but I can easily remember how the UK called for help in defeating Hitler. Who came to the rescue? It wasn't Italy, France, Russia...it was the USA and without us, England would have been toast! Ask any Brit old enough to know! I believe history shows we won that one. Whatever, or wherever, you are, you owe gratitude to us for our help!
2007-08-15 16:08:01 · answer #7 · answered by ArRo 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
mr britsusedto rule the world,
if the us fought an unlimited war, they would smoke any country. they try to be politically correct and humane, and wind up losing a lot of their own. yes there are a lot of secondary casualties.
the politicians restrict what the military can do.
stick that koran where the sun don't shine.
2007-08-15 16:06:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
The US was a peace-loving nation until Bush stole the election. Then his first priority was to invade Iraq so that his Halliburton futures would hit for major millions.
We ***** and moan because we know our sons and daughters are being killed for no good purpose other than to enrich Bush, Cheney, Rove and the inner circle.
2007-08-15 16:06:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
The little british troll returns,
Kid you are a disgrace to the U.K.
the best part of you ran down your dads leg.
2007-08-15 16:41:55 · answer #10 · answered by conranger1 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋