English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

Survival of the fittest.
The frolicking monkeys then left Africa for Europe and the Americas The still monkeys left for the middle east, waiting and watching for their chance get their retribution. Some still monkeys have made their way to the Americas and Europe. They stay still, silent, and wait. Watching, planning, on the ready, next step will be a repeat of evolutionary history.
Survival of the fittest

2007-08-17 02:08:01 · answer #1 · answered by Marla ™ 5 · 1 0

You'd think with all the raving atheists about, someone would actually teach Evolution.

Evolutionary theory says similar creatures had common ancestors. Humans cats and monkeys are all mammals, but humans look more like monkeys than cats. So the common ancestor humans and monkey share is much more recent, than the one we share with cats. Humans look more like apes than monkeys. So the common human ape ancestor is more recent than the human monkey one.

No one thinks monkeys turned into humans. The theory is that they both had a common ancestor. It's like saying if Spanish came from Italian, how come people still speak Italian. Not the case. Spanish and Italian both come from Latin.

Of course nothing absolutely prevents the common ancestor from surviving, it just rarely works out that way. Nothing absolutely prevents modern people from speaking ancient Latin.

JTFR. You don't have to agree with Evolutionary theory, but you should make an effort to get it right.

2007-08-15 20:37:41 · answer #2 · answered by Phoenix Quill 7 · 0 0

Because if you rearrange the letters in frolicking, you get:
"ring if lock"

And monkeys includes the letters k-e-y, which would unlock the "lock" in frolicking. Obviously!

Hey, it makes more sense than creation science.

2007-08-15 09:17:13 · answer #3 · answered by eV 5 · 1 0

in case you went to the zoo with the objective of seeing monkeys, why are you bowled over that there are monkeys there? Sorry, Creationist, yet your attempt to poke holes making use of this drained, old observed fails miserably. human beings did no longer evolve from monkeys. human beings and monkeys proportion an elementary evolutionary ancestor.

2016-10-15 10:57:30 · answer #4 · answered by starcher 4 · 0 0

the frolicking monkeys over frolicked and passed out that's why they're still...

*drink*

2007-08-15 08:00:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

if you believe the darvin idea ok we accept it is right if right.
your answer can say may in old some of monkies group staied in far jungles &another went &saw another world &step by step after too many times they learned then in effect in their genetic &their concious go up for that some brain will progress &another remain in jungle is monkey yet more...
thanks

2007-08-15 08:27:13 · answer #6 · answered by poweret30002 1 · 1 0

My understanding is Prehistoric Crocks morphed into Cyotoes

2007-08-15 08:02:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

we didn't evolve from monkeys...we have a common ancestor, we didn't evolve from anything thats alive on this planet now. we've been on different evolutionary paths for ages. monkeys, apes, orangutan's..etc all have their own evolutionary paths from a past common ancestor.

2007-08-15 08:33:46 · answer #8 · answered by nightskygoddess1 2 · 2 0

double drink

it isnt the monkey you see at the zoo. it was a primate of the sort.

read the bible. it explains all you need to know about dinasours, evolution, cave men, Australopithecus afarensis, Australopithecus africanus, etc...oh wait, no it doesnt my mistake.

2007-08-15 08:06:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

And yet we all still frolick ourselves..

2007-08-15 08:01:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers