Well lets think about the reason Kashmir wants to separate from India in the first place. India places no value for the people of Kashmir or their culture. They have been treated with such cruelty and have high rates of poverty. If India wanted to keep Kashmir,then they need to want to keep the people of Kashmir happy as well, because the Kashmiris are "unoffically" the true owners of that land, so when people tell Kashmiri's to leave Kashmir and go to Pakistan just because they are majority Muslims, why should they leave what is theirs? Muslims are also a part of India and when the partition happened not all muslims chose to leave India cuz they were happy in India (a very good example of this is Hyderabad) I prefer Kashmir to stay with India because I think they are a rich a beautiful culture and I would hate for India to lose that, but if India continues to treat them with such cruelty then I would want them to become independent or have a fair vote as to where they would like go.
2007-08-15 16:44:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ashiya 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
And what about those 20,000 civilians killed by militants.Indian A rmy didnt kill 1,00,000 people in kashmir.Minority Hindus are deriven away by militants in Kashmir.Isnt that a human rights violation.Only some in Kashmir valley are anti-Iindia,rest are supporting India.Does it mean that only Kashmir valley represents Kashmir.What about Ladakh,Kargil,Jammu valley.
Why does Pak want Kashmir???Just because of the simple face that Kashmir is a Muslim Majority state,it is because of this reason that Pak wants.I t is the most ridiculous idea I have ever heard of.India was partiitioned into two,because Jinnah wanted a separate homeland for Indian Muslims.Even after Partition,more number of Muslims live in India than in Pakistan.
2007-08-17 12:32:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Alien 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Firs resettle all the persecuted kashmiri pundits back in Kashmir. Then ask the Punjabi Paki army to move out of Kashmir and then call elections.
According to paki Muslim thinking parts of Britain and other western countries where Pakis have settled in large #s should belong to Pakiland.
BTW Britain has become the whipping boy for much of the chaos everywhere. While they were no saints they were or are not as evil as some like to see them. They have a humane side too. They certainly did not convert people by force or destroy our temples with the glee the Muslims did.
2007-08-15 23:41:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by lunistan 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
There are more than a few such disputed regions in the world. It's international politics. India and Pakistan both want Kashmir - not because Kashmir is all that vital, just because having it makes them bigger countries. Governments are pernicious that way. China occupies Tibet. Taiwan doesn't want to be part of China - but doesn't want to be independent, either. The people of Korea would like to be unified, but neither the Communist Dictator of the North, nor his American enemies sponsoring the South will allow it. Brittain gave Hong Kong back to China, even though the people of Hong Kong didn't want to belong to China. Brittain, for her part, just can't seem to let go of one corner of Ireland.
2007-08-15 14:45:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
So the Indian Army has killed more than 1 million in Kashmir, most of them women and kids!!!
With only 70,000 men???
Would you care to post links to your propaganda sources.
As for trying to blame it on the British, they granted the Indian Nation its Independence in 1947, the poor Indians (Pakistanis & Kashmiris) started agitation for control almost immediately, so its an internal problem.
The poster of this question is an obvious troll.
2007-08-16 04:17:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by conranger1 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Your question has wrong one sided statistics , can you provide statistics for the following :
How many original residents were killed when Muslims invaded India (Afghanistan and Pakistan)were parts of the olden Indian empires ?
How many people werem killed when Pakistan attacked Kashmir in 1947 when the king of Kashmir decided to merge with India ?
India is the only country divided on basis of religion , and this inspite of giving the best treatment to Muslims who were historically aggressors and killed , looted,converted a lot of Hindus.
Most of Muslims in Indian subcontinent are Hindus whose ancestors were forcibly converted to Islam by torture,threat.
Lots of people living in Kashmir today are not original Kashmirirs but people from Pakistan illegally staying in India, it suits them to claim Kashmiri origin and opt for siding with Pakistan. They also commit terrorist acts and when they get killed, blame Indian army for human rights violation,torture etc.
60 years and why have the so called Kashmiris not opted for working towards making a better India ?
60 years and why have Pakis not given up on their futile dream of Islamic state ?
60 years and how many Kashmiri Hindus have been purged ?
60 years and why Kashmiris are not allowing Kashmiri Hindus to stay peacefully in their own land ?
60 years and why have the Brits not owned up their wrong doing in splitting India and worked towards unification ?
Few thousand years and still the killing of people under name of Islam continues in the Indian subcontinent.
We are all sick and tired of these killers and looters, they have destroyed a once peaceful and beautiful country. Destroyed universities,libraries, prosperous kingdoms and have given nothing back, absolutely nothing.
These guys couldnt even protect India against the Brits.
2007-08-16 03:24:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by funnysam2006 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
kashmir problem can only be solved if the people who were betrayed by Jinnah are allotted lands in Kashmir by Government of India and Pakistan.
The lands of hindus snatched consequent to evil Jinnah can make several Kashmirs.
Else Muslims can be sent to Pakistan and Kashmir partitioned based on Jinnahs two nation theory
2007-08-19 10:11:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
India was supposed to hold free elections to determine the future of Kashmir in 1955. Since that time they have illegaly occupied Kashmir and have been trying to resettle enough Indians into the area to win any election that might be forced on them.
Any settlement of Kashmir would hae to be done AFTER the Indians have withdrawn
2007-08-15 14:43:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
now look it is not a simple discusion abt one contry its about pakistan and india u know wht i mean? every time when india want to get own kashmir, nothing will happen to pakistan but all peoples that died in fighting are kashmiri, and when ever paki wana do the same thing tjen same thing will happen again. now at the moment kashmir dont want to shair its land with india or with pakistan. they want to make their own nation. the nation in which no one can hurt them . no country can kill the civilians live in kashmir.
2007-08-15 14:51:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by ricky 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
i agree, blame the British, but seriously, during the partition whoever wanted to move around did, what were these kashmiries waiting for? If india started giving away parts of the country just because the citizens want it that way, india would not be a country
2007-08-15 14:37:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋