2007-08-14 17:28:10 · 8 answers · asked by kegia_mitchell2000 1 in Travel ➔ United States ➔ Los Angeles
Why would they do that? There are 40 million people in this state. We're not exactly experiencing a population shortfall.
The only places that pays you to relocate are the kind of settlements nobody wants to move to.
The Yukon and Northwest Territories in Canada still pays new residents money ($30,000 to $50,000), but that's because it's frozen all year long and nobody wants to live there. And the only reason why the Canadian government cares is because they need settlers there to lay claim to the oil underneath all that ice.
In terms of the U.S., I don't think any state government actually pays you to relocate there anymore. With even the smallest states having over 500,000 residents, nobody is in danger of emptying out. Places like Montana and Alaska will give you a huge tax cut for living there. But that's as far as they'll go.
2007-08-14 21:28:55 · answer #1 · answered by SFdude 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just how bad are you? They may pay to relocate you to a jail cell but thats about it!
2007-08-15 02:44:00 · answer #2 · answered by Traveler 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope
2007-08-15 10:25:14 · answer #3 · answered by copestir 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. However, if you are moving based on employment reasons, you can use the expenses as a tax write-off on your Federal tax.
2007-08-15 15:25:41 · answer #4 · answered by kontrolfreak66 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You dont want to move here, theres nothing here for you, Stay where you are, Californias full.
2007-08-15 12:25:39 · answer #5 · answered by steven v 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
what the heck are you smoking. you're on your own. the state would go broke if they start paying everyone to locate here.
2007-08-15 13:10:50 · answer #6 · answered by DEAD II 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry dude Wyoming is the other way.
2007-08-15 19:24:32 · answer #7 · answered by ofgc12 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. You're on your own, buddy.
2007-08-15 02:42:12 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋