Are we still at War with iraq, to Fill the pockets of Haliberton, and government contracts for war,on OIl,Gas?

Question

I just dont see any reasons, as to why we went over to iraq, after congress and the senate except for a couple, signed a bill of war against terrorism, against the country of Afganistan, in which Bin Laden who the President exclaimed was the man behind 9-11-2001.
i can understand that after we deverted to Iraq, to help clean up what Dad Bush 41 wanted Sadom out, Sadom met hell in 2005, its after his capture i dont see why we are still In the country of iraq at war, other than to load the pockets of the Rich, greedy, and Powerful country's, also how much is our Hog money payouts, to the UK, And all the others who we had to buy to stay on with us to go fight iraq? lets leave in Surges as we came, and devert back to the war we really went at with Afganistan. Should be much more easier if we leave quickly, if al those taliban are over in Iraq, then whose watching their backs in Afganistan, Maybe its time for Rove to slide out, Bush and Chaney try to look smart, Devert out!

Answer 1

Find someone you don't like, cut off their head and see how well their body works without a central control.... that's what we did to Iraq, it's not filling pockets of fat rich men, it's call "Reconstruction." How would you feel if some foreign power came in and took out our entire infrastructure then up and left? We need to be there, but the situation is so hairy now that we can't really fix the country, so pulling out could be the best thing to do, or the worst, only time will tell, it's all in the hands of W's successor.

Answer 2

No, and we never were at war for that.
Do you remember 911? Do you recall the thousands and thousands of people in Iraq that were murdered and died at the hands of Al Qaeda and dictators like Saddam?
Oh, and 3% is not getting anybody rich.
Keep listening to the left, the people that can't come up with anymore excuses.

"A second element of public concern over America’s motivations for striking Iraq is the suspicion that Washington wants to seize Iraq’s oil fields to pump the oil itself. Seizing oil fields doesn't do anything for American oil security. The crucial requisite for energy security is to get the oil on the market and to prevent any disruptions to supply. In terms of the energy security of importing states, it is irrelevant who sells the oil and who buys it. Oil is a global commodity and the price is not set in Baghdad."
04/2003 Valerie Marcel & John Mitchell

"If it was a war for oil, we wouldn't have done it.

Because if you look at the consequences – Iraq is now producing less oil, it's more unstable, it has led to disruptions in the market. Even today, nine months later, Iraq is producing – and I don't have firsthand knowledge – less than two-thirds of what it was producing before the war.

So it just doesn't work for me. There has got to be another reason. I assume that the reason is global security."
12/21/03 Dave O'Reilly

"I find the accusation that this administration has embarked upon this policy for oil to be an outrageous, scurrilous charge for which, when you asked for evidence, you will note that there was none. There was simply the suggestion that, because there is oil in the ground and some administration officials have had connections with the oil industry in the past, therefore, it is the policy of the United States to take control of Iraqi oil. It is a lie, Congressman (Kucinich). It is an out and out lie. And I'm sorry to see you give credence to it."
02/23/03 Richard Perle

Answer 3

Over 80% of Iraqin oil exports are under contract to a French firm (Compagnie Petrol De Francais). Halliburton has nothing to do with that oil except to provide expertise in getting the drilling and delivery infrastructure up to snuff.
The Congress authorized the use of military force against iraq in 2002. I've put the URL for this law below. And, for your information, the correct terms of address for the two gentlemen named Bush who served as President are Bush the Elder and Bush the Younger. Now quit watching CNN and MSNBC!

Answer 4

This gets so tiring. ok, Bush took us into Iraq basically for oil (which we are secretly working off with in barges) and for their old friends to get wealthy. WHAT replaced into the reason each and all the DEMOCRATS VOTED FOR THE conflict???????? WHY DID JOHN KERRY desire to pass into IRAQ??? OR JOHN EDWARDS OR bill CLINTON OR AL GORE OR ANY OF THE OTHERS?

Answer 5

You got two subjects mixed up, are you just trying to amuse yourself. You can't even spell Sadam or Cheneys name, let alone figure out what Osamas first name is. That question has about as much credibility as your education. Be nice. Do something good. You sound like the kinda creep that would be our nations next sniper. So the answer to your question is , no.

Answer 6

STOP SMOKING CRACK!!!