replaced into it morally staggering for Egypt to maintain the Hebrews as slaves previous the term of the debt? Egypt replaced into out of compliance with Holy regulation. There are going to be many people who'll die because of the abominations against Holy regulation and that they're going to spend a rather heat eternity for coming up such situations. the main severe desires that individuals be a Holy and Righteous human beings. And, have been human beings residing under the words of Holy regulation, issues could be somewhat spectacular by evaluation to the sewerage we are residing in now. an excellent number of what the main severe has to assert approximately such is in financial disaster between the Anointed, The choose, and The Damned! have been it the case that "please" or "end" labored, issues could be somewhat distinctive. it incredibly is unlucky they don't paintings. The outcomes are stiff. they are additionally morally basically. it could desire to not look like such on the floor, yet whilst one considers each and all of the ramifications and outcomes, it incredibly is totally basically certainly.
2016-12-15 15:12:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hey Gummy, the Pharoah wanted all the males born to slaves killed so that they wouldn't grow up and become strong enough to revolt.
The slaves' deity killed every single firstborn son throughout the country, including animals, so long as there wasn't blood on the door. And no, that was not moral.
Using the biblical way, 9/11 was just the Angel of Death sent by god to kill any American on a plane or working in those buildings.
No justification for unjust murder can ever exist.
2007-08-14 09:38:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Was it moral for God to kill the firstborn males in Egypt? sure it was kill all white people and black people and anyone that has pigment in their skin. or all kids between the ages of 3 months and 6 years. oh and don't forget the teenagers too, little annoying brats. in short, no, not right at all. but hey it could be worst, he could actually exist. then what, everyone is screwed.
2007-08-14 09:42:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by RuG™ 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
God is completely sovereign over all His creation. He can do with His creation what He pleases, when He pleases, how He pleases. If He chose to destroy the earth today, He would be well within His rights to do so. All that God does is right, moral, good and for His glory and good pleasure. Simply because you do not understand His reasoning for doing things, does not mean He is acting in a way that is wrong or immoral.
2007-08-14 09:40:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by BrotherMichael 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Was it moral for you to ask this question? I would have killed everyone but the first born myself but then there's always next time hahaha! What the heck is moral anyway just a word that people chose to explain something they did rite or maybe someone else did they felt as wrong, what if there is no rite or wrong?
2007-08-14 09:39:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by chris77 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was pharaoh Who pronounced sentence not God. Pharaoh was to send his men to kill the first born of Israel. this was a picture of Gods salvation program. Saved by the blood of the lamb. God was carrying out the sentence of mans law.
It is not God Who should live by mans law, but man who refuses to live by Gods law.
2007-08-14 23:39:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pharaoh was warned to free God's people several times or suffer the consequences- that last plague was what it took to weaken Pharaoh----- He chose to ignore God...God did what was necessary to get his attention.
Was it moral??- taking into consideration of how much blood (of God's people) was on Pharaoh's hands- it was justified.
2007-08-14 09:53:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by darkness breeds 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all, God DID NOT kill the firstborns. Pharaoh did. It says so right in Exodus. Second of all, God didn't make Pharaoh do it either. Satan did.
God = good Satan = bad...
If you didn't mean that in your question, I don't really know what your talking about.
2007-08-14 09:38:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
How is that Pharaoh offered the same threat to Israel, but God beat him to the punch? Pharaoh chose his fate. Read Exodus 9-11
2007-08-14 09:37:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by ♥Sunny Girl♥ 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. Moral standards come from evolution, which applies to societies as well as to species: a society which adheres to a sound moral code will survive preferably to one that does not. It follows that wanton killing of any population is immoral. But the biblical story is fiction.
2007-08-14 09:37:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋