How do evolutionsts expect us to believe in evolutionism when it says things like this?

Question

According to the Theory of Evolutionastics, life began in the ocean, and water organisms eventually evolved the ability to live on land. This is how the theory of evolution explains why we have a lot of organisms on land and in water. According to evolutoionology, all land organisms were once water organisms.

Evolutionists will tell you that frogs evolved when fish grew legs and feet. They'll also tell you that snakes are just eels that learned to live on land. Another thing evolutionism says is that seahorses came on land to evolve into regular horses.

But most evolutionists won't tell you the last step. If all land animals evolved from sea animals, then what did humans evolve from? The theory of evolution requires that humans must have evolved from merpeople who lived in the sea.

But there is no documented scientific evidence that merpeople exist, so humans could not have evolved from them. Therefore, they must have been intelligently designed by God.

Answer 1

ur right. And also Why do they hate God?

If there was evolutionastics, why don't the monkey have gills? The athiezt shut it mouth when asked such a question.

ppl are supposed to belive that a rock has wings then why aren't we seeing it answer me that athiestz? HAhahahaHAH! It is so obvious evolutionastics are the liar. Satan is still among us have his way. are we to belive that a rock became of goo and all of sudden fish said I will be with legs?

Do not belive hypocrits then ur say that God is false and that monkey ppl is come of dust. what dust?? what monkey? we see them still...hahaha.

Answer me that, evolutionastics?

Answer 2

Doesn't the theory of evolution say that we evolved from monkeys, not merpeople? Wasn't that what a big deal was made about when the theory came out? So, why would you even bring up merpeople? The general idea is that everything adapts for where they are. I don't think it's that much of a stretch, even as a Christian. Who says that God didn't create the earth via evolution? 7 days to us may not be the same as 7 days to God.

Answer 3

You`re right , but you shouldn`t expect an intelligent answer from evolutionists ............... as you can see by the above "answers" .

They`ll tell you that you don`t know science , or that there`s plenty of evidence of evolution when in fact the only "evidence" exists in theories . Most evolutionists have a hard time even spelling the word , but for some reason I`ll never understand , they consider themselves "experts" on the entire subject , when in fact they haven`t a clue what they`re talking about .

They feel that the explanation "primordeal soup" and "common ancestor" are convincing "evidence" . But when asked to explain specifically the mechanics of these terms , all you get are more unintelligible theories and explanations , which would cause even a hard-core evolutionist to hold back his laughter .

Answer 4

lolol you are totally misinterpreting much of what you read. Where in the world you got anything to do with "Merpeople" I can't imagine. There IS no such ridiculous "theory of evolution" that requires such a concept. If you take your reading matter from writings by fanatical creationists, (I've read a few of them myself) it is obvious that they want to do anything they can to discredit Evolution, and it is for this purpose they frequently introduce "twisted facts" and half-truths which are the worst kind of lies there are.

Quite frankly, those who support Evolution don't really care what creationists want to think and believe. Everyone is entitled to their own beliefs. So we do NOT "expect you to believe" in Evolution. We don't get all upset and bent out of shape about people who want to argue that a mysterious invisible superbeing waived his invisible arms, or snapped his invisible fingers, or whatever he/she/it did and POOOOFF everything appeared just like that. I'd love to be able to pull a trick like that with my household appliances when they die on me and I have to replace them with new ones, LOL. No, it is YOU and those who believe as you do, who seem to have such a hard time with anybody who doesn't think and believe the same way as you. Sorry, but we're here, we're here to stay, and mark my words, the numbers are growing, whereas the "Poooofff" believers are declining. This has happened many many times in the past. A few hundred years ago people were being put to death by the powerful leaders of "The Holy Church" for going around insisting that the earth was round, not flat, and that our planet was not the center of the Universe, as "true believers" at that time insisted had to be true because that is the way "God" had made it to be. Well, we know where that ended up, don't we? Same thing is one day going to be true about Evolution vs. Creationism. You and I may not live to see it in our lifetime, but eventually it'll happen, and you can take that to the bank.

Answer 5

Whoa. Are you being serious?

All species are related by common ancestry. Humans are related to other primates by sharing a common ancestor. And for the upteenth time, we can share blood transfusions with chimps because we have over 98% similarity in our DNA. Genetics confirms evolution.

Evolution has been going on for billions of years. Consider this, and forget the merpeople nonsense. If you go far enough back, all life is related to simple-celled organisms.

Answer 6

You need a better understanding of evolution. All life originated in the sea, true. But not every species evolved from something that existed in water, except through a very, very, very long chain of other organisms. Humans evolved from a proto-homan form, which evolved from an earlier primate form, which evolved from something before that, and so on back in time for literally billions of years until we get to that point where our ancestors came up out of the sea.

Answer 7

You have some slightly faulty logic there. Regardless, have you read 'The God Delusion' but Richard Dawkins?

Yes, I know it's all about atheism and you probably don't believe a word of it, but if you're asking questions like the above then you're certainly interested in the issue.

Why not pick up a copy in the secure knowledge that if your faith is strong enough then nothing Mr Dawkins can say will shake it. Read it carefully and thoughtfully, discuss it with friends. It'll be a lot more productive than positing the existence of 'merpeople' as a necessary scaffold for evolution, trust me!

Answer 8

I can't believe the way you insult our merpeople ancestors.
Just because you can't figure out the magnificent way they recirculated water from both ends to achieve oxygen absorption, or the perfect design for underwater dog-paddling; --you conclude they didn't exist.
Well, let me tell you this Buster (or Beatrice or whoever) I know that MY great, great, great, great, great, great, great grandparents certainly did EXIST, and they were perfectly wonderful merpeople, who enjoyed their life at sea.
To this day I really enjoy bathing, and watering the plants.
So , how do you deal with that,---smarty pants?

Answer 9

ive under no circumstances heard "Evolutionists will inform you that frogs developed while fish grew legs and ft. they are going to additionally inform you that snakes are purely eels that discovered to outlive land. yet another ingredient evolutionism says is that seahorses got here on land to adapt into primary horses." ever and ive studied evolution... so i say they assume you to have self belief that reason you an fool? or according to risk your purely screwing around dropping time like i'm or according to risk somebody did inform you that and their the fool... all life started as prteins that developed to become better and none of it grew to become right into a rapidly line no "and then the seahorses lost the sea and beacame horses crap" purely saying guy you opt for a center college technology e book or maybe wikipedia...

Answer 10

That has got to be one of the worst anti-evolution argument o have ever read. It makes horrible generalizations. Sea horses into regular horses? if you did read that somewhere it was eaither written as a joke or by an idiot. Sea horses are caled sea horses because they resemble horses, not because it is thought they are the direct ancestors of horses. It is arguments like this that make creationists look like idiots. People from Merpeople? I hope to god your question was a joke...if not, then i truly pity you.