£125,000 - what can you buy with this before you have to pay 1%? This should be like £200K shouldn't it? Prices have gone up so much since the last re-rating.
Surely there should be a £1m+ stamp duty of say, I don't know, 5%?
2007-08-14 01:38:42 · 5 answers · asked by Galien5 2 in Business & Finance ➔ Taxes ➔ United Kingdom
Yeh but this country is in serious debt, the government needs as much tax revenue as possible, nothing is going to change to lower anything, especially with Gordon Brown in charge, the stealth tax king himself.
2007-08-14 01:53:16 · answer #1 · answered by agius1520 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As has been pointed out Gordon Brown will not change the stamp duty thresholds as he is no longer Chancellor.
The next revision to the levels will probably be made in the Budget speech next March.
I'm not sure why you think the threshold for the 1% rate should be as high as £200,000. This rate is designed to help first time buyers and as such should be restricted to smaller properties. The average house price is now around the £200,000 mark so by definition about half the houses in the country will be worth less than this.
The 3% rate covers property up to £500,000 so this could be considered the "standard rate". Larger properties are already charged at 5%.
2007-08-14 03:21:54 · answer #2 · answered by tringyokel 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He become between the super names who did no longer want a identify, possibly because of the fact of his length and capability. a million. 1975-1985 2. His length made him nicely regular. He additionally had many fulfillment out and in of the ring. 3. i do no longer think of so. seem at what got here approximately with vast tutor, he become shown crying while he by twist of destiny hit AJ. the comparable element (by ability of that I propose he ought to tutor weaknesses and giants recently are no longer feared like Andre in his days) ought to happen with Andre if he have been to debut in WWE interior the present. 4. If he become as stable as in the previous and if tutor wasn't around, then in all probability particular. 5. approximately 4-5. 6. i can purely think of of Undertaker as I wasn't waiting to witness wrestling from the 90s. 7. particular and no. Andre's length is stable for glaring motives and undesirable because of the fact it makes him sluggish. Taker's length isn't a project because of the fact even nevertheless he's very almost a 7 footer, he remains quickly and would additionally be a severe flyer. 8. in all probability to furnish Andre the honour of being champ lower back in the previous retiring yet i do no longer think of he mandatory it that factor because of the fact that he become already a super megastar. Are my solutions stable sufficient? Lol
2016-12-11 19:28:18 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think he is more likely to lower it. He is middle belt Scottish old labour and what he really believes is that only bloated capitalist Tory pigs want to own their own house and the sooner we all live in council houses the better.
2007-08-14 01:53:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
whenever Alistair Darling, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, decides to do so.
2007-08-14 01:46:46 · answer #5 · answered by Will 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋