The bible speaks of Jesus as being a firstborn son, so any brother would have been younger.
2007-08-13 19:24:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I believe that James was younger. As were the rest of the half brothers of Jesus.
2007-08-13 19:24:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Christian Sinner 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I was told there was a possibility that Joseph being an older man had a family before Jesus.
Jesus had no real brothers but they his cousins called bretheran in Bible passages, John the Baptist was his first cousin and so was the Apostle Jude.
I never heard that James was his brother; I think James brother was John the one that wrote the 4th gospel, they were the sons of Zebedee.
2007-08-13 19:30:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Tapestry6 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Younger.
2007-08-13 19:24:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by So Now I Sing 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
He was younger, since Jesus was the firstborn son of Mary, she having been a virgin before he was concieved by holy spirit.
Peace be with you
2007-08-13 19:36:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
younger, christ was the first-born, and james was obviously a half-brother since joseph wasn't Jesus' father.
2007-08-13 19:28:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by prismcat38 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
why younger of course Joseph never "knew" her till after Jesus was born, because Jesus was born of a virgin
2007-08-13 19:24:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
would of HAD to have been younger since before Mary had Jesus it says that she was a virgin.
2007-08-13 19:26:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Johnny B 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
younger I am sure as mary had no children before Jesus.
2007-08-13 19:27:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
well since Jesus was born of a virgin - you figure it out
2007-08-13 19:25:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋