Sexuality is a normal condition of the sex nature; Sensuality is a abnormal condition or a sin. Sexuality is God-given, God honored and God-blessed, between a married man and woman. Sensuality is the perversion of sexuality, and a sin. Do you all think this is true?
2007-08-13 16:48:20 · 12 answers · asked by flannelpajamas1 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Thats what they would like you to believe. But, its wrong. There is nothing sinister about sensuality. For most of us, it is a precursor to the act of sex.
2007-08-13 16:54:35 · answer #1 · answered by kajun 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No sensuality is that of the senses . Art can be sensual in rich colors but sexuality is only that which is of sex and naturally would include the senses and heance the word sensuality is an inherent part of sex for you couldn't hardly have sex without the senses . perversion is the abnormal use of the sex and incorporates the senses as does most everything .
2007-08-13 23:54:15 · answer #2 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No. Just because God created heterosexuals to populate the planet does not mean that He did not also create others whose relationships are just as sacred, God-given and God-honored. Any rules which apply to a married heterosexual couple--until we also obtain the right to marry--also apply to same-sex couples.
Within the confines of the marriage or committed relationship, sensuality would not be a sin. God gave us senses to use and one of the uses would be in the context of a committed, loving, consensual relationship.
2007-08-14 03:19:37 · answer #3 · answered by Michael B - Prop. 8 Repealed! 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Sexuality is an abnormal natural way of procreation after the Fall of Adam. Sensuality is the excesses practices of sexuality if you would like to put it that way.
In other words sensuality is lust or the overindulgences of sex, just like gluttony is, in relationship with food.
There will come a time when Man are restored to their rightful place - from a natural being to a spiritual being; and only then will they related properly in perspective concerning their sexuality. By then, that man will have no need of sex and neither would the woman. For they have found true union with God and living the fullest in His Life and Will here on earth as it is in Heaven.
Well, I know , that's a mouthful. Hope you and readers can stomach it ?
2007-08-14 00:02:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
sexuality. If you think God's love is in the flesh you are wrong. Do you know what the flesh is, does the bible teach you? when you married your wife, did other men stare at her with you? did you say ya she is beautiful in this orgey knowlage everyone has with the eyes. Sex is a sin, if you do not marry, God will threw your love with eachother into hell. But marraige is a place where you can go your own way in sex, but you still do not go God's way. You know the scriptures, but not Gods heart and power. For his will is suppose to be done on earth as it is in heaven, and it is not.
2007-08-13 23:57:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No I don't. I don't believe that I have to be married to have sex. It's a natural function. If I care about somebody enough to want to expose myself in that way I will. The only time I think sex is wrong is when it's used to get something out of somebody, and even then it's not a sin. Just degrading.
2007-08-13 23:54:17 · answer #6 · answered by Becca 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
No Sensuality is about pleasure. There is an art to sensuality. My sensuality is between me and my husband. How is that wrong? Sex is nature. Sex is love. Sex is pleasure. Sex is life. Nothing between two consenting adults is wrong.
atheist
2007-08-13 23:51:21 · answer #7 · answered by AuroraDawn 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
No but close.
Sensuality leads to sin but it is not a sin between married people.
2007-08-13 23:51:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes
2007-08-13 23:51:27 · answer #9 · answered by prismcat38 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
no. I'm highly sensual with my fiance, she with me...no one else. It just means you are extra sultry...extra excited.
2007-08-13 23:51:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋