Same reason they didn't send Clinton/Gore to Somalia or Afghanistan, or Bush Sr./Quayle to Iraq/Kuwait, or Kennedy/Johnson to Vietnam, or Roosevelt/Truman to Guadalcanal.
Same reason we don't send Pelosi, or Hillary, or Murtha, or any of the Lieberals/Demoncrats over there with a weapon.
They're political leaders, not military leaders. DUH!!
2007-08-13 15:05:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dave_Stark 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
You do have to give all of these guys some credit. They are in the public eye 24/7 and have to continually make decisions that affect the world. When you are right, everyone loves you, but when you make a mistake...well, we know where that leads.
Bush is an idiot alone, but his people that really make the decisions are not. We have not had another major attack in this country since 9/11. So they have succeeded in that. If they would have sat by and not gone to war and another major attack happened, they would have been blamed by us for not going to war. They were pretty much in a lose/lose situation. But I agree they could have made some better decisions. Hopefully the next powers that be will
2007-08-13 22:10:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Robert C 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Why don't you check a few facts instead of just listening to the Bush haters. Don't you know they have been on his back...and Cheney's etc. because they want only one thing...to get back the white house. They have kept up the anti-Bush propaganda for going on eight years...with this one purpose in mind.
I for one don't want a Wimp for President and am glad he sticks to his guns for what
he believes is right...now matter what! Yes politics are politics...and politicians are politicians, but some do have some ethics, determination, loyalty to our country and to freedom, and refuse to bow to those who have only one goal in mind.
Wake up and smell the coffee and start thinking for yourself...which you are not doing...you are just listening to "spin".
Bush showed incredible wisdom in appointing Cheney, Rove, and others who would not bend....would keep their own loyaltry to the President, and have their own integrity, which is why they hate them so much. Too bad for them!
Personally, I plan to find a President who is more worried about us than his own legacy!
I don't agree with every opinion of the President, but he goes a long way in trying to protect us...unlike many on the other side who couldn't care less!
2007-08-13 22:09:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by samantha 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because I have an M-14 and I will use it against anyone who tries to kidnap President Bush and send him anywhere. You can't even spell Cheney or Rove, yet you seem to think yourself intelligent enough to decide for the rest of us. You need to remember that Bush got more votes in 2004 than any candidate in history. We are still here. We will fight back. Keep threatening us and you will lose...
2007-08-13 22:04:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Hmmm, why didnt we send McNamara, LBJ, and Humphrey to the Nam with M14's?
Truman to Korea with a Carbine?
FDR to Saipan with a Flamethrower?
All corrrupt administrations that got FAR more Americans Killed
2007-08-13 22:51:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
They exceed the maximum age the military would let them join.
2007-08-13 22:17:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by woodchipper890 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Oh! I just love it when you liberals talk tough. It's so manly.
2007-08-13 22:02:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I think everyone should serve. go draft
2007-08-13 22:00:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by catchup 3
·
1⤊
1⤋