"If GOD doesn't have ONE purpose for all of mankind then does he have any at all?"
God does have a purpose for all mankind but it is mankind that has rejected Him and His purpose for their own desires.
2007-08-13 11:09:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by drivn2excelchery 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
Prophesy explained which i intend to write about despite the death threats i have recieved and the mocking, because the disasters i have predicted have come true and any mindreader can tell you this is what i truly beleive. But further to your q.
If Jesus never came to earth TODD would have His rightfull place as Gods Son who became the Lamb that was SLAIN(SiL A I IV=SLAIN when read between the lines) who was God the one inthe Light(see g h (ie 9 I7)) in the light) who became the king of KINGS and Lord of LORDS.
And since TODD was/is an orphan your helping Him would be considered a religious act. And also the only pure religion as the bible stated. except you can also help other orphans, and don't need to obey god or anyone claiming to speak for HIM. it is purely up to you whether you help or not unless abaddon or jehovah forbid you to help an out- orphan in which case i would probably consider you a coward unable to overcome your fear or abaddon and jehovah. and if Me is God like the commandments say (literally) commanded to worship no god but Me then Me is a description of God. ie Me=IVI sealed together arm(=e) So who writes the written WORD correct Me or foreigners trying to conquer the world (ie the italian dons and also the Hebrew jehovah). Who through the ages have oppressed and murdered your brothers and sisters? Who has caused less pain to your inner child, Me or the dons and the churches who want to control everything? Perhaps God's purpose is to free mankind from this forced worship of italians and Hebrews/Jews? And i really don't require any worship as God the FATHERR but requir the same rights as you think you have, the first one being you have no right to get hit or assualted. So although the newspapers have censured my writtings, you can still see i am allowed to write on the internet, and perhaps if it was truly the world wide web, you can understand why the bible said their would be noplace where the rulers, generals, etc.. could hide from the wrath of God. In fact right this minute i praying for a disaster to befall my enemies and i predict i will see it happen on the tv news very soon, can't tell you what it is, but i will now itwhen i seen it, then i will gloat that Jesus loves Me, and Hell hates Me.
2007-08-13 11:26:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
An interesting question.
I believe that the Bible actually makes this point in Isaiah.
Quite a few atheists on these boards have claimed that the only reason people have a specific religion is because their parents had a religion, while at the same time claiming to have shrugged off the religion of their parents or childhood. Chop logic, to quote a favorite saying of Isaac Asimov.
I assume they would have to agree with your reasoning since their own "chop logic" follows a similar line, except, generally there is no reason in "chop logic".
You make a good point that is worth consideration.
My opinion is that no, the majority of the world would not be monotheistic. Yes, I believe that mankind has a purpose.
2007-08-13 11:15:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Actually, there would be a lot more Buddhists. It managed to spread quite nicely out of touch with Christianity for several hundred years. Buddhist missionaries had even traveled west to Palestine and Greece. In fact some scholars suggest that Jesus himself may have been exposed to Buddhist teachings. Buddhism, by the way, is not a pagan religion.
2007-08-13 11:53:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by The Doctor 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am glad you are asking questions, but you are still very self-limiting with your baseline assumptions.
Had Christianity not taken over the Roman Empire (whether or not there really was a Jesus), some other sect would likely have, sooner or later. Maybe there would have been less atrocities/genocide in the name of a "one true god;" maybe there would have been more. Things could be remarkably similar to how things are now, just with different symbols and names - or it could be radically different; we have no way to know.
This is just one domino in the lineage of history. Countless others could have made similar changes.
As far as your interpretation of human purpose, I again suggest that your self-imposed limitations may be preventing you from exploring other options.
2007-08-13 11:16:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by kent_shakespear 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Jesus even stated that the Holy Spirit might desire to come. The islam conspiracy tries to alter what Jesus stated, yet in good judgment besides as in regulation, "historic precedent" potential that the burden of preparation rests on people who set forth new theories and not on those whose innovations have already been validated. the previous checks the warm. The already user-friendly authority judges any new claims to authority. on condition that Islam have been given right here alongside many centuries after Christianity, Islam has the burden of preparation and not Christianity. The Bible checks and judges the Qur'an. on a similar time as the Bible and The Qur'an contradict one yet yet another, the Bible might prefer to logically obtain first place through reality the older authority. The Qur'an is in blunders till ultimately it proves itself. Muslims violate the belief-approximately historic precedent by utilising putting forward that Islam does not have the burden of preparation and that the Qur'an judges the Bible. N
2016-10-15 05:33:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He has a purpose for man kind, and the purpose is for mankind to accept Jesus in your heart to be able to dwell with God for all eternity
2007-08-13 11:16:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Benito S 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
A small group of people believe in a mono theistic God?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_religious_groups
Hindus argue that they are monotheistic.
That means 68% of the world are monotheists.
2007-08-13 11:08:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Jesus never "came to earth" because he's a fictional character. The story of a resurrected "savior" is neither unique nor original to christianity.
Did a historical Jesus exist?
http://www.nobeliefs.com/exist.htm
Pagan origins of Jesus:
http://geocities.com/christprise/
http://www.medmalexperts.com/POCM/index.html
http://mama.indstate.edu/users/nizrael/jesusrefutation.html
http://www.rationalresponders.com/a_silence_that_screams_no_contemporary_historical_accounts_for_jesus
http://www.truthbeknown.com/origins.htm
http://www.sacred-texts.com/cla/pcc/pcc09.htm
http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_jcpa3.htm
http://www.harrington-sites.com/motif.htm
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/resurrection/lecture.html
http://www.geocities.com/paulntobin/virgin.html
2007-08-13 11:09:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by YY4Me 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Incredible isn't it? The effect one desert tribe had on the course of human history?
2007-08-13 11:08:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by robert 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I never read your questions anymore, because I know it won't make sense. Why make myself dumber by your never ending list of Non Sequiturs and Straw men?
I won't. Peace Watahead!
God did it! 2 pts!
2007-08-13 11:07:34
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋