According to a report from the Death Penalty Information Center (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/FactSheet.pdf )
• The California death penalty system costs taxpayers $114 million per year beyond the costs of keeping convicts locked up for life.
Taxpayers have paid more than $250 million for each of the state’s executions. (L.A. Times, March 6, 2005)
• In Kansas, the costs of capital cases are 70% more expensive than comparable non-capital cases, including the costs of incarceration.
(Kansas Performance Audit Report, December 2003).
• In Indiana, the total costs of the death penalty exceed the complete costs of life without parole sentences by about 38%, assuming
that 20% of death sentences are overturned and reduced to life. (Indiana Criminal Law Study Commission, January 10, 2002).
• The most comprehensive study in the country found that the death penalty costs North Carolina $2.16 million per execution over the
costs of sentencing murderers to life imprisonment. The majority of those costs occur at the trial level. (Duke University, May 1993).
• Enforcing the death penalty costs Florida $51 million a year above what it would cost to punish all first-degree murderers with life in
prison without parole. Based on the 44 executions Florida had carried out since 1976, that amounts to a cost of $24 million for each
execution. (Palm Beach Post, January 4, 2000).
• In Texas, a death penalty case costs an average of $2.3 million, about three times the cost of imprisoning someone in a single cell at
the highest security level for 40 years. (Dallas Morning News, March 8, 1992).
2007-08-13 09:03:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by davidmi711 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
The expense is not the issue for me. If the person made a mistake and we have a corrections system that prepares him to reenter society and be a productive citizen, then it's an investment. On the other hand if a slime bag is serving life without the possibility of parole then I'm with you, a few bucks in chemicals or a couple of dollars in bullets would be the way to go. On that note, punishment needs to fit crime. Murder = Death, Rape = Castration, Burglary = Fine + Time to rehabilitate, etc.
For those who purport that it's more expensive than incarceration, that's because you are assuming that the appeals and frivolous law suits and psych evals and all the other crap on the price tag wouldn't occur in the instance of incarceration versus death. Most of those expenses are going to occur anyhow, with the exception of the executioner's salary and the chemicals, the criminal system has been designed to allow the criminal to tie up as many resources as possible on their case with or without merit.
2007-08-13 09:19:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jim 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The cost per inmate depends on what state you live in. Due to numerous appeals, the execution process isn't always cheaper than housing an inmate for life.
2007-08-13 09:04:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by cassandra_sd 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I have often heard that to get someone actually executed it turns out more expensive than years in prison. Not sure I see why, but they explained that because of appeals, psych evals, legal fees, court costs, etc. it ends up very expensive.
Leave it up to good ol' softy US legal system to find ways to profit at taxpayers expense.
Why don't we outsource executions to Mexico or China? I bet they'd so it cheaply. We could also save by using a solar electric chair.
2007-08-13 09:06:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by topink 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It costs millions to execute an inmate. It is far more cost effective to give a convicted felon life.
2007-08-13 09:06:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Buffy Summers 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
i'm no longer indignant at companies with the aid of fact i think that government spending and taxes interior america of a are uncontrolled. Congress could desire to do away with earnings taxation. as a replace, a nationwide sales tax could desire to be presented. that could desire to do away with the choose for businesses to conceal the money exterior the rustic. companies could be loose to make business company judgements in accordance with what makes financial sense. There could be no could desire to waste time and money on complicated schemes to shrink taxes. on the comparable time the choose for lobbying the Congress could be very much dwindled. related to unlawful immigration - Congress could desire to do away with the incentives for illegals to come back right here. One coverage that could desire to be eradicated is the computerized citizenship for all toddlers born interior america of a. basically little ones born to electorate/criminal citizens could desire to be eligible for citizenship. yet another coverage that needs to get replaced is loose training for little ones of illegals. If we gave college vouchers to criminal citizens and made illegals pay the completed training from their very own wallet - that could desire to do away with between the incentives to come back to the US.
2016-10-10 03:53:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no exact number, every case is different. $45,000 - $146,000. That includes all aspects of costs. Starting with investigations and trials.
2007-08-13 09:13:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by smellyfoot ™ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It costs China about 35 cents for the bullet.
2007-08-13 09:02:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
In Alabama, I would say it costs about $150.00 per instance!
2007-08-13 09:10:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know but it should cost the government, 3,000 dollars per year to house an inmate. The are cons, not luxury guests!!!
2007-08-13 09:01:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by clayman 2
·
4⤊
3⤋