Dinasaurs were around with people....?

Question

But you may other wise say no... why would you say no well because the word dinasaur was made up till the late 1800's and say they found their first dinasaur in 1800 yet people born 1,000 years ago drew pictures and talked about dinasaurs

http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/2.asp

so you may be wondering what my question is and the answer is that: Do you believe me?

thanks for your time

i dont understand how you cant believe but in the bible they talk about a creature that sounds just like a dinasaurs

people a thousand years ago did not find dinasaur bones
please click and read the webpage

Answer 1

HAHA!
iS SO FUNNY HOW THE ATHEIST GET ALL WORKED UP OVER THIS DISCUSSION.
AND,YES,i DO BELIEVE DINOSAURS LIVED ALONGSIDE WITH PEOPLE. :-}

Answer 2

People born 1,000 years ago drew mythological dragons, not dinosaurs. If such people had ever actually seen a dinosaur, why would they draw them with wings, and breathing fire? Sometimes a fossil dinosaur bone discovered by such people fueled the dragon myths. Many times though, they attributed such giant bones to a race of extinct giant humans. Why would they do that, if giant reptiles were walking around right in front of them? In spite of all the wishful thinking that is posted about the "inaccuracy of carbon dating" (such people don't even realize that there are almost two dozen other methods of dating ancient materials, and that multiple methods corroborate one another) the fact is, dating techniques are currently very accurate, and becoming more accurate all the time, and of the thousands of dinosaur bones that have been dated, none is more recent than many millions of years. Sorry, but radioisotopes don't lie.

Answer 3

ROFL .. I have a better page for you honey:
http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/faq.php
Did humans and dinosaurs live at the same time? No.

The Flintstones and Alley Oop notwithstanding, the last of the dinosaurs — with the exception of the birds, which are dinosaur descendants — died about 65 million years ago. There is no REPUTABLE evidence of human life at the time, or at any time until about 2.5 million years ago, the age of the oldest known fossils in the genus Homo.

There have been periodic claims of human footprints, teeth, etc. being found together with dinosaur tracks or other fossils. None of this fossil evidence is credible; all cases of "human remains" from the time of the dinosaurs have been investigated and found to be either forgeries or misidentifications.
http://paleo.cc/paluxy/paluxy.htm

Answer 4

That article states that the earth is most likely 6000 years old. Recently a discovery was made of a village at the bottom of the English channel that is 8000 years old. How do you reconcile the two?
That web site is by no means giving you the complete picture. In fact it is distorting the facts.
Don't believe me. Do the research for yourself.

Answer 5

consider this, okay? how come there are no bones of humans , mammals, birds, fish. etc. found with dinosaur fossils? the oldest known mammal and bird fossils are found in much higher levals in the ground. if dinosaurs and mammoths for example, died at the same time, why have dinosaur bones turned to stone, but not mammoth bones? why are there no dinosaurs frozen in Siberia....? and why arent fossils scattered indiscriminately all over the earth?

Answer 6

It's great if people drew pictures of dinosaurs a thousand years ago. However, that just means that people a thousand years ago discovered dinosaur bones, and drew pictures related to that.

Also, many small lizards look like the big dinosaurs of old, so they could have drawn pictures of them, too.

Drawing pictures is not a way of verifying dates of when creatures lived on earth, though.

So, no, I don't believe you. But thanks for trying to explain this irrational belief.

Answer 7

Dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago. Man was not in existence then. And 1,000 years ago, there were no pictures of those creatures nor did our ancestors talk about dinosaurs back then.

And the article you posted is very, very weak. Sorry.

Answer 8

No. The fact that abstract patterns resemble dinosaurs does not mean coexistence.

Answer 9

Based on the very biased source you give, no, I do not believe you. I believe the fossil record and the theory of evolution.

Answer 10

The Jesuits consider Genesis 1-13 as a myth.

If cain and abel were the only children of Adam and Eve how the hell would they reproduce? Sodomy?

Answer 11

Don't forget the stories of Humpty Dumpty and Mary and her Little Lamb ...

Sheeshhhh .