if he can prove she is not a good mother.
2007-08-13 06:24:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by JerseyBtch 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, you will choose the father's consent. If he's absent (as in 0 touch) for a lengthy time, you may petition to terminate his parental rights, yet that's a criminal technique with very particular steps you will possibly prefer to take. If he then has no criminal parental rights, then i think you may substitute your daughter's final call. purely having criminal custody isn't adequate although. so a procedures as getting finished custody, i might touch the relatives courtroom on your county and get the essential place of work work to report. additionally they'll grant criminal help telephone numbers to steer you throughout the time of the approach. although, i might recommend getting an lawyer to handle the custody technique. that's especially complicated. good success. :)
2016-10-15 04:44:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by broderic 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That would only be the case if Both Parents are in agreement and the legal aspects are handled as far as going to Family Court and/or Mediation. Also, if the child will not be in any danger with the father; that he nor anyone in his immediate family and household, has no prior problems wtih the law, especially when it comes to a sexual pretator nature. He also has to be able to provide a stable and caring environment for the child with the right foods and schooing and daycare and medical care. I see no reason for him not being given his child especially IF he does LOVE His Child. Good Luck.
2007-08-13 08:06:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dub-G 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Last name has absolutely nothing to do with it. It will be completely a non-factor.
In any case, you do not provide NEARLY enough information to answer this question. It depends on dozens of factors, including his wealth, how he treated the mother, why they split, did he keep up with child support, how good a mother the mother is, who the daughter WANTS to live with, etc. etc. Factor in addition to that the fact that there is always two sides to the story, and I am thinking you only know one side. Generally speaking, though, if the mother isn't a crack-addict or abuser, then she is likely keeping the kid. Sorry.
2007-08-13 06:25:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mr. Taco 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Usually the courts give custody to the mom unless somehow she's unfit. Last names don't mean much. My daughter has her father's last name and he's only ever sent her $50.
2007-08-13 06:32:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
ok, my parents are no longer together, i have my dads name and my mom cant even see me, but thats because she is an unfit mother. so unless he can prove to the court that she is an unfit mother... then the chances of him getting coustody are kinda low.
2007-08-13 06:30:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Miss ECP 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not by a name... you have to prove its in the best interest of the child.. the courts wont just pull a child from a home because one of the parents wants full custody.
2007-08-13 06:26:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by MamaX2 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
He might be awarded joint custody but I doubt he will get full custody unless there is some problem where the mother is unfit to take care of the child.
2007-08-13 06:25:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The last name really does not matter..As long as she has a good case and just stands her ground she will get it. The custody usually goes to the mother unless the mother is an unfit mother...
2007-08-13 06:25:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by puertolinda2003 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Last name has nothing to do with it. And most courts will not award either parent full custody nowadays; rather, they support mediation and joint custody (unless it can be proven, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that one of the parents is unfit to parent).
2007-08-13 06:24:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by BK 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
It depends on how the mother is. If judge thinks the father can take care of his daughter better than the mother. The father might get full custoday.
2007-08-13 06:30:54
·
answer #11
·
answered by F T 2
·
0⤊
0⤋