English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

So we don't have to?
Check this reference. This isn't an American bashing you. It's a request for help from one of your own.

http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/08/13/ap4011806.html

2007-08-13 03:58:41 · 7 answers · asked by FOA 6 in Politics & Government Military

Hearing that Persians and Arabs are not the same is tiresome and a matter of semantics.

There is certainly no visual difference.
Its like saying "Oh I'm from Alabama not Georgia!" Big deal.

2007-08-13 23:30:14 · update #1

7 answers

Totally agree with you and would also like to say that even if the Iraq problem was sorted out tommorow and peace reigned acroos Iraq.
The allied forces would not pull the troops out untill the Iranian problem was settled.

Iraq, gives the allied forces the perfect staging post as a next step to Iran. Most of the trouble in the Mdlle East, boith past and present, can be attributable to the Iranians.

A friendly (to Iran) militia taking control of Iraq would be a feather in the cap for Iran, the actions of Iran, need to be curtailed rapidly.
Manyallied servicemen are dying due to the indirect actions of Iran.

2007-08-13 06:11:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The article isn't talking about Arab radicals. It's making reference to the control of Persian radicals! The other day, Egyptian authorities arrested 40 members of the Muslim Brotherhood. That's the organization which Seyyid Qutb helped found. He's the author of "Milestones", the "Mein Kampf" of the Salafist Jihadist movement of terrorists. The Saudis and Yemenis have also cracked down on terrorists within their borders.
Iran has put itself on a slippery slope. Ancient memories of the Persian Empire still exist in the minds of the Arabs. If the guys in Tehran are not careful the members of the Arab League will crush them like a bug.

2007-08-13 11:16:19 · answer #2 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 2 0

Believe it or not some Muslim countries like Egypt, Pakistan, Jordan, etc.. Are cracking down on radicals...


The above user is kind of harsh when he called them lawless dogs.... Sorry that they have a different culture...

Besides honetly I wouldn't mind to live in a place were divores rates are zero due to the fact that women are not allowed to go out and whore around at a club.

2007-08-13 11:20:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The Arab world has been taught that the west ,Jews and Christians are the root cause of all their problems.
If your camel dies ,blame 1 of the above,never mind that you hadn't fed it in 6 weeks.
While Muslim poor go hungry the political and religious leaders live very well and teach hatred of all things not Muslim.

2007-08-13 11:28:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Of course not! I agree with ClashMan "they are lawless animals", who should be banned from the North American Continent.

2007-08-13 12:12:49 · answer #5 · answered by Michel 4 · 1 0

They never will because the majority of them are lawless animals...they have a completely different view of life, politics, women, society, etc....they will never be able to integrate themselves into a democratic lifestyle, so why bother?...I say we let them destroy themselves...

2007-08-13 11:06:37 · answer #6 · answered by ClashMan 2 · 2 1

Because they're too busy teaching their people to become "radicals"

2007-08-13 11:26:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers