no no no he didn't care about all that bambi and dino crap, that was just filler material until he got to humans.
2007-08-13 02:34:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
3⤋
You are surely an Inquisative one arent you..!
If 99% of all species that have ever lived had become extinct then surely wouldnt you be on your OWN on the Planet..!!?
Mr 1%
Love Always
2007-08-13 13:39:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Apolo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let's see, 99% species failure, 99% prayer failure, 100% amputee restoration failure, 100% verifying evidence failure... I'd say this character is 100% successful of having all the qualities of an imaginary entity. But then again, that's to be expected when mixing poorly conceived imaginary entities with real world applications.
2007-08-13 02:46:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
On what evidence you make God as their creator and go along to hold Him responsible for it?If you have decided to assign this role to him,then it's for you to invent all other related aspects as well.In an on-going process like evolution, the so called extinction is actually a 'constructive destruction' and it is happening even right now.Try to multi task with 4-5 jobs at the same time and you would soon realize what it takes to even cope up with that than succeeding.Nature has a way which would always remain superior to any humans,who themselves are one of it's products.
2007-08-13 02:48:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by brkshandilya 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
I believe in God, bit the universe was probably created by the big bang. There isn't evidence of intelligent design. No true evolutionary biologist supports the theory; any evidence that has been put forth has not held up to true scientific scrutiny.
2007-08-13 02:37:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Eventually 100% will go extinct, this means including humans. I don't see much reason in that either. We're no more than a mold that has evolved a different kind of intelligence in order to survive than other evolved molds. We live on a dust particle in our known universe. We have no more significance in the universe than the molds in a moist shed have any significance to us now.
2007-08-13 02:45:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Batfish 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
The success lies in the 'intelligent design' being able to eliminate or eradicate species that are inferior, thereby leaving the more 'perfect' species. This has nothing to do with 'god', it's just simple evolution
2007-08-13 02:37:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Intelligence is a relative term. Intelligent design is merely a phrase suggesting the design is as good as a human could make it.
It's a wonder anything survived.
2007-08-13 02:37:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jack P 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
It's probably even higher than that. The design process usually gets it down faster than that. Even optimization problems don't require the number of iterations life does. Then again life is probably alot more optimized to it's environment than my rust bucket I drive.
2007-08-13 02:36:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Epic Fail
2007-08-13 02:34:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
If there is a 99% failure rate that your child would make bad choices, would you throw away that 1% of good choices in him? And what if someone else said I will take care of that 99% of bad choices so that your child can live in eternity because of that 1% choice that he made, wouldn't you want that for him/her?
2007-08-13 02:38:29
·
answer #11
·
answered by sassinya 6
·
0⤊
5⤋