How could Flight 77 fit into that small hole at the Pentagon?

Question

The damage at the Pentagon was far too small for a plane of that size!
Where is the Black Box for Flight 77?
With all the security cameras at the Pentagon why is there no video of the plane crash of Flight 77?
Why is there no wreckage of Flight 77?
All plane crashs leave wreckage!
Why is there no evidence at all of the plane crash of Flight 77?

Planes do not simply disappear!

Does anybody in the FAA have any real answers to my questions? I think not!

It seems that most people will believe anything that they are told!
Including Flight 77!

I'm still waiting for a real answer!

JUST AS I THOUGHT!
NOBODY HAS A REAL ANSWER!

I guess it's time to move on to the next plane crash with no wreckage!

I Agree With Jim P.

Hey!
Sir William-
There is Video that show the aircrafts that hit the WTC along with hundreds of eye witnesses,

Answer 1

Oh no not this question AGAIN.

Answer 2

Where're the FDR and CVR? Where do you think? Do you think the public is entitled to access to them?

You know how flammable aluminum is. How much of it would you expect from a fire with such a large load of kerosene?

Wreckage was found--as much as could be expected--as you have seen. So were human remains.

Security videos of the aircraft in flight and crashing might well be kept secret. That isn't surprizing.

The hardest components can survive a high speed air crash and fire. But the rest stands a good chance of being disintegrated very badly. Look at the results of the Valujet DC-9 that crashed into water in the Everglades. No plane or bodies left.

Answer 3

Aircraft accidents on film are pretty rare. That is why there is no video of the pentagon accident. There was only one shot of the first plane hitting the World Trade Center, then everyone grabbed their camera and started video taping, which is the reason why there are so many shots of the second plane crashing. Did you NOT see those videos? I am guessing you did, so why is it so hard to believe that one hit the Pentagon? And by the way, it wasn't a "small hole!"

Answer 4

I'm certainly not saying that I don't believe the flight hit the Pentagon. But, I have always wondered how, with the Pentagon being very low -profile in height, and being surrounded by many other structures in the D.C. metropolitan area - the airplane was able to make a low approach into the building without striking other objects in the vicinity. Just wondering from a strictly flight-dynamic basis? Seems like it would have been extremely difficult to manuever with inexperienced pilots at the helm.

Answer 5

Every time I ask the same Q, they tell me to quit asking stupid Qs.

Actually the hole isn't that small, and the engines are closer to the fuselage than it seems. Here are some very good pictures that show how wide the hole was. http://www.oilempire.us/pentagon-photos.html

But...The plane, made out of titanium, stainless steel and other materials made to withstand intense heat, vaporized, yet they were able to identify almost everyone on the flight by their DNA? From charred body parts?

Why did the plane vaporize but not papers in the rooms of the pentagon?

How is anything, plane or missile, able to get that close to the most secure place on earth? Even after the Twin Towers were hit.

Answer 6

The truth is that no one can pull off a conspiracy of that magnitude without alerting A GREAT MANY people who have a vested interest in the safety of the aircraft.

If your conspiracy theory was true, then they would have a very hard time hiding all of the passengers and crew of Flt 77. Also, how would they keep all of those air traffic controllers quiet about it?

Your conspiracy theory (like all other 9/11 conspiracy theories), does not hold any water.

Answer 7

An aircraft like a 757 is like an empty soda can. Mostly thin metal surrounding a bunch of air. The Pentagon IIRC is constructed from large blocks of limestone or some other stone.

The metal being malleable is going to give way before the stone will. There are some heavy and dense pieces like engine cores and landing gear that will stay pretty much intact but most of the rest will crumple.

http://www.chicagomortgagecompany.com

Answer 8

the plane did not hit the pentagon, it hit the lawn and THEN slid into the building. the plane did not have the same mass when it slid into the building.
and as far as i remember, there was not a small hole, most of that side ended up coming down.

have you ever seen the pentagon? it is a pretty big building!

Answer 9

Because aircraft are very soft and the pentagon is very hard, so the wings and stuff just turned to tin foil. Now roll on the conspiracy theorists, but their stories have no supporting evidence.

Answer 10

...your question is a bit flawed... where is the wreckage of the aircraft's that hit the WTC...? none was found... (they disintegrated in the heat and fire)... Flt 77 crashed, exploded and was consumed in the fire... many "pieces" of it were recovered... don't be a "media" drone... "they" don't have very many answers...

Answer 11

Oh God...This has to be one of those "boomerang" questions. Check all the other hundreds of questions just like this i am sick to try to explain to you boneheads it was not an inside job and most of the so-called evidence i mentioned below is just plain coincidence...just cause you see lots of coincidences doesn't mean it was planned by the US Gov.! Believe what you want i don't give a damn about it o still think Osama's the real culprit here!!! Read all the answers, google "9/11" just stop asking so many questions about 9/11 what has been done, has been done for good1 you can't press the rewind button cause there is no such thing in REAL life!!!

Dude just think about it...something as massive as a commercial jet smashing into a building made out of a special type of reinforced concrete at a speed of around 450-480 mph goes in like a cruise missile...just from that force, most of the aircraft will be smashed to pieces.

A plane is made out of duraluminium and other metals. The impact would shatter the airplane int thousands of minuscule pieces, while maybe the wing roots, the wing pods, engines and landing gear will still remain partially intact. Then kerosene burns, blackens and distorts everything, so investigators can't really tell which bits are from the Pentagon, which are from the plane. Was the wreckage of the two aircraft that hit WTC found? NO. Just to get an idea of what a kerosene fire can do: It has been proven that the WTC Towers WOULD HAVE SURVIVED just the impact of the aircraft. But the intense fire, combined with the unevenly-spread fire retardant coating on the structure of WTC Towers(you could have seen on a National Geographic documentary that most parts of the WTC structures were covered in thick fire retardant coating, while others were totally exposed) caused extensive structural damage, bending and distorting all the unprotected steel beams, until the Towers' structure could't take anymore and just gave way.

Ok now, returning to the Pentagon. Lots of debris were found, but the footage was shot after some cleaning up was done, so the investigators and the NTSB could take away some of the debris. Plus, the damaged part of the Pentagon fell ON TOP of most of the debris, so that's why you can't see lots of them

Sir William is right. You really need lots of evidence to accuse NTSB,the police and the US Government for covering it all up. Of course they intentionally masked-up some stuff in order to try and keep the people calm, but they didn't do a complete cover-up.

The answers that Chris H, SirWilliam, polak4life, and Jeff L(pentagon ain't made out of limestone)have given are right, don't make a fool out of yourself. You don't get a "rewind" button in life, to watch it again and again to prove your point.

Just face it: Osama screwed us bigtime in 2001, but we'll take our revenge...kill him with a carton of goat milk :)...or a yellow screwdriver.

But, there are some pieces of so-called "evidence" that may suggest the fact that 9/11attack was an "inside job"...Scary? maybe, but still remains to be proven, for now it's just a bucketful of crap. Here's a statement made by a guy who knew Larry Silverstein: "The MOST 'inside' fact about the '9/11 inside job' conspiracy is the fact that all 3 main WTC buildings(the North tower, the South tower and WTC7) were leased to ONE MAN: Larry Silverstein, and all 3 fell down in one day: September 11, 2001. The guy invested $15million in a 99-year lease of the WTC complex, and after the disaster he won $7billion. The guy sure got lots of money. Are you sure he didn't do it on purpose?"-crap talk for some, pure truth for others. And more stuff: from physics tests&analysis, the WTC Towers fell at "FREEFALL SPEED", meaning that when those top parts started crashing down, the encountered ABSOLUTELY NO RESISTANCE from the intact floors below! Both the buildings fell down in approximately 15 seconds, while calculations say they should have been to the ground in at least 40-45 seconds. Think about this: "from physics tests&analysis, the WTC Towers fell at FREEFALL SPEED". When the top parts fell, they fell through...nothing. Nothing slowed them down, like the intact floors below didn't even exist. Plus footage of random jets of horizontal debris ejections, on both buildings, all at the same time, 5 secs before the South Tower fell. So this evidence shows that if 9/11 was an inside job, it was more like a controlled demolition(secondary explosions took place in both buildings at regular intervals after the planes crashed). If it was an inside job, something is going wrong in our government. I, personally, am not stupid and naive enough to think this could be a internal problem, so Osama still stays in the Army's hit list. If you believe or not(i don't think it's plausible) it was an inside job, it's your opinion not mine, so watch the videos if you want. - I'm not trying to convince you that it was an inside job, i'm sorry if the vids sound offensive/propagandistic to some of you -
The list of "inside job" vids: go to www.YouTube.com and search for 9/11 Coincidences. There are 15 movies and 3 updated ones

Whatever. Keep on filling up the "Aircraft" question list with aircraft questions, not conspiracy theories. Just stop. It was 6 years ago.

Some funny Osama pics to lighten up the tense atmosphere around here:

http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blosamatoiletpaper.htm
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blosamagoatmilk.htm
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blosamamanofyear.htm
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blosamajihadjoe.htm
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blosamaarnold.htm