If you want Creationism or intellegent Design taught in schools. Do you want Science teachers teaching it? or?

Question

Intellegent Design -- How would they teach that Aleins or Gods or a God came down to earth and started the human race when their is no science to back up these ideas. Should this be a philosophy class. Should Science teachers be expected to explain this without even a hypothisis let alone a scientific theory.

Answer 1

If creation was taught it would be in English class because religion is where many of the book's topics came from same with world history it would help to explain why things happen as many wars were over religion as well as much of American history.


P.S. there is proof that God exist when looking at the big bang theory where did the energy come form that caused it and you can't prove any of the other way the universe was created

Answer 2

There should be a special class for 'Intelligent Design'. In the same class, they could also teach 'Stork Theory' as an alternative to biological reproduction, and 'Smart Earth-Suck' as an alternative to the theory of 'gravity'. The students who signed up for this would, of course, get to ride to school on the 'short bus'.

Answer 3

No. Scientists should only teach what they know. Scientific theory. However, it would be good to give the child a rounded perspective of our society, that every argument has two sides, and let the child figure out for himself what he wants to believe in.

Answer 4

without past expertise of the present united states extensive college curriculum, your question might for sure advise that evolution isn't being taught at the instant interior the college equipment. the actuality of the situation is a extensive form of folk do no longer settle for the thought of evolution as actuality, this might reason implications if those particularly everyone isn't keen to project their little ones to teachings that they discover fake. this might stress those comparable human beings to place their little ones in a non secular college to preserve them from the time table of the college equipment to sell its ideals. the situation for non secular human beings is that evolution creeps into the faculties with the aid of fact, on an identical time as violating the sense of right and incorrect led to by ability of our frontal lobes, it does not violate the form that's in super prefer with preserving the separation widespread. Religous training, regardless of the undeniable fact that, violate the form and are for this reason banned from being a needed requirement. interior the attempt to maintain the Church and the State separated i might settle on on an non-compulsory type to benefit at a extreme college point basically. this might furnish training that suits the desires for those meaning to benefit, yet does not violate the form by ability of MANDATING faith classes for commencement. Having those training at a extreme college point guarantees that its members are engaged by ability of their loose-will, and provides them the prospect to settle on the actuality for themselves as taught by ability of the district appointed instructors.

Answer 5

How do you pick the religion for the creationism concept? All religions have some form of supreme power.

Personally, religion doesn't belong in school any more than in politics. It belongs in church.

Answer 6

Creator is Lord God as we believe, teachers can meet the requirements

Answer 7

Creationism should not be taught in schools...period. It belongs to Sunday schools.

Answer 8

No,nothing should be taught as far as our origins,people should look into that themselves.

Answer 9

They would not say God or alien they would say this "intelligent designer"