English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-08-12 10:45:52 · 14 answers · asked by G.xi 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

14 answers

I think his traits went that way.His son Cush was the father of the Ethiopians and his son Mizraim founded Egypt .So I think they were all dark Arabic looking.The family of Japheth as they moved through Europe got lighter and blonder where as his other brother Shem,fathered the Persians and hebrews and that area.
I'm sure you know the three bros,were Ham Shem and Japheth.Sons of Noah.

2007-08-12 10:54:04 · answer #1 · answered by AngelsFan 6 · 4 0

You can read Gen. 10. He was probably dark complexion. The sons of Ham are Cush, Mizraim, Phut and Canaan.

From Ham's descendants came the Africans (or Hamitic)/ Ethiopians (part of the Sabaean kingdom of Aksum), Egyptians (founded by the Menes-Thinite dynasty) and Libyans (originally Phoenician colony). Also the Chaldeans.

From Canaan, the Semitic Phoenicians, Hittites, Jebusites, Amorites, Hivites and Girgashites, Canaanites, Zemarites, Arkites, etc..

70 Nations are listed in the Scriptures. Fourteen came from Japheth and 30 nations from Ham. Twenty-six from Shem .

Also check Psalms 105:23 - it states "Then Israel went to Egypt; Jacob lived as a foreigner in the land of Ham. So Egypt is sometimes called Ham.

I understood your question as written.

2007-08-12 11:09:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ham was the son of Noah, not the reverse.

The curse Noah placed upon Ham for his rude, disrespectful ridicule of Noah made him the father of black people. Ham & his wife were banished or fled in shame to what is now known as Africa.

2007-08-12 10:58:01 · answer #3 · answered by faith 5 · 0 0

Ham was Noah's son..not the other way around. No he was not black. He married a black woman.

2007-08-12 10:50:47 · answer #4 · answered by maozSFCU 3 · 0 1

Dear Sir,
I am a black man and as a writer concerning why the black race is not making progress in Africa, I carry out a research and I am very interested in this topic.Some say the curse is the problem. Though you have not said that,I like the explanations you made and I need some clarifications and I will forward a question.For instance, the passage in Genesis talked about the philistines as descendants of Cush and I would like to know if the philistines were blacks. Thanks

2016-08-15 22:37:43 · answer #5 · answered by Williams 1 · 0 0

It never says that in the Bible. The claim that he was black was used by the Slave owners to justify slavery because the Bible does say his children were to become the servants of Noah's other sons' children.

2007-08-12 10:52:26 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 2 0

No.
It has been a very popular idea, but not true.
The pervading thought is Canaan was cursed and the curse was to be black.
However, God likes that colour. He made it.
It can't be used as a curse.
They were all mulato ....which is also a politically incorrect word.

2007-08-12 10:58:10 · answer #7 · answered by Uncle Thesis 7 · 0 0

Fallacy !! ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ The scripture some drunken Noah problems many. learn of God’s notice continuously sheds mild. considerable to notice two times for emphasis it incredibly is written, HAM the daddy OF CANAAN. (Gen.9:18-25) And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, have been Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the daddy of Canaan. (19) those are the three sons of Noah: and of them replaced into the completed earth overspread. (20) And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard: (21) And he drank of the wine, and replaced into drunken; and he replaced into uncovered interior of his tent. (22) And Ham, the daddy of Canaan, observed the nakedness of his father, and instructed his 2 brethren with out. (23) And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon the two their shoulders, and went backward, and lined the nakedness of their father; and their faces have been backward, and that they observed not their father's nakedness. (24) And Noah awakened from his wine, and knew what his youthful son had performed unto him. (25) And he suggested, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. So what's the nakedness of his father, the nakedness of their father, or their father's nakedness? (Lev.20:11) And the guy that lieth together with his father's spouse hath uncovered his father's nakedness: the two one among them shall easily be positioned to loss of life; their blood would be upon them. (Lev.18:8) The nakedness of thy father's spouse shalt thou not come across: it incredibly is thy father's nakedness. Canaan replaced into the newborn of Ham and his mom or Noah’s spouse. ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~

2016-12-15 13:04:27 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

no
Ham was Adamic
Duet.32:8 When the most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel.

Notice it say's SEPARATED the son's of Adam??????????

2007-08-12 10:49:28 · answer #9 · answered by Royal Racer Hell=Grave © 7 · 0 0

No, he was the same race as Noah.

2007-08-12 10:49:02 · answer #10 · answered by Q guy 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers