Do you think there will be any soft tissue T-Rex's in the bunch? How can protein live in a bone for 69,000,000 miles?
2007-08-12 08:11:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Christmas Light Guy 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
First of all, it was Switzerland.
The question is often asked, "Where are all the human fossils with dinosaurs?" Actually, where are all the human fossils with any animals? Human fossils are extremely rare, and that’s what you would expect since they would have survived the longest in the Flood.
As Dr. Jonathon Sarfati said, “The more intelligent creatures would find a way to escape until the very end, leaving their bodies nearer the surface, where post-Flood erosion would destroy most evidence of their existence. Humans would have been most resilient of all, clinging to debris and rafts, before they died of exposure...”
With that line of reasoning, you can’t prove that man and Dodo birds lived together since their fossils are not found together. If human bones aren’t found buried with dinosaur bones, it simply means they weren’t buried together. It is pretty unlikely that humans and dinosaurs would live together for the most part (Would you choose to live near a large carnivorous dinosaur?).
Another thing you have to realize is that 95% of all fossils are marine organisms and 95% of that remaining 5% were plants. The percentage of the remaining animals is extremely small. So, we should not expect to find many human fossils at all, and we don’t.
Besides, the evidence from the jumbled up bone fragments can easily be misinterpreted. They have confused a dolphin’s rib for a human collarbone and an extinct pig’s tooth for a human tooth before. Couldn’t they make similar mistakes concerning human and dinosaur fossils? Especially since they are looking at the evidence from an evolutionary paradigm. Given the amount of sedimentary rock, we still have a great deal more to explore. There is still the possibility of finding human fossils in the lower levels of Flood sediment and along with dinosaurs.
And actually, more than once, there have been fossilized human footprints found along with dinosaur footprints. As you know, the evolutionists just quickly dismiss the evidence or try to get it discredited. They have to—it doesn’t fit their paradigm.
In a copper mine in Moab, Utah, two human skeletons were found in Cretaceous sandstone (supposedly more than 65 million years old, back in the time of the dinosaurs). So what did they say? They must have fallen down to that level somehow or were recently buried there.
In 2005, there was an interesting report by the Associated Press: “Villagers digging in China’s rich fossil beds have uncovered the preserved remains of a tiny dinosaur in the belly of a mammal, a startling discovery for scientists who have long believed early mammals couldn’t possibly attack and eat a dinosaur.” It was a dog type of creature. Evolutionists had previously said that no advanced mammals lived during the time of the dinosaurs. But, the more we dig, the more this kind of stuff is found.
For decades, evolutionists taught that coelacanths (a type of fish) became extinct about the same time as the dinosaurs (65 million years ago). Because its fossils looked “prehistoric” and because of its large fins, scientists speculated that the large fins evolved into feet and that its descendants eventually walked out of the sea. That’s until Dec. 24, 1938 when a five foot long coelacanth was caught off the coast of S. Africa. Since then, over 100 of them have been caught and researchers have found that Indonesian fisherman had been selling coelacanths in their fish markets for years. Guess what, the coelacanths are still using their fins to swim, not walk. No fossils of coelacanths have ever been found in the same layers as human fossils, but they have been found in the same layers as dinosaur fossils—yet we know coelacanths and humans lived together, because they do today.
In 1994, the Wollemi pine tree was found in Australia (also said to have become extinct with the dinosaurs). Professor Carrick Chambers said, “The discovery is the equivalent of finding a small dinosaur still alive on Earth.” Before these were found, if you would have said, “I believe that coelacanths and humans or the wollemi pine tree and humans lived together,” they would have said you were nuts. Just because we don’t find fossils of certain creatures or plants together with humans in the fossil record, it doesn’t mean they didn’t live together.
2007-08-15 14:05:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Questioner 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Through out the bible, parables are told to demonstrate the intent of God's word and in a way which is easy to understand.
After the creation story in Genesis, it says that to God a day is like a thousand years. Clearly, the intent here is to point out that the 7 days of creation was not intended to be taken literally. The literalist is wrong whether he is a believer or non-believer.
So, God might have used evolution as the tool to create mankind and the rest of the world, or maybe he didn't.
The bible mentions dinosaurs by the way.
Your hatred for Christians is predicted in the 10th Chapter of Matthew.
2007-08-12 15:19:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by plezurgui 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. They have already found dinosaur and human footprints side by side . And there are cave paintings of dinosaurs. The average dinosaur was the size of a chicken. We have them today as well, iguanas, alligators, crocodiles, etc. Many did not survive the ice age that briefly followed the flood of Noah, because of the cold temps..The only reason you call them dinosaurs is because they are extinct, yet 100 species of animal goes extinct every year (nat'l geo). I guess the dodo bird is a dinosaur now too as well as the passenger pigeon and Coelacanth--oh wait, a fisherman caught one of those, even though they were definitely prehistoric and extinct millions of years ago.hmmmmmm.
2007-08-12 15:15:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by bro_tj1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
My guess is we'll never be told, if this is the case. Looking at your article, it said this is an existing site that is bigger than originally thought. They found two Plateosaurus. They say are they are about 10m, about the size of modern day alligators (lengthwise). So far, Big Deal. Ho-Hum find. The fossil record is a complete mess right now. Way too inconsistent to put much credence in.
2007-08-12 15:18:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by JohnFromNC 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No humans have been found with the frozen mammoths as yet. And that was only 10,000 years ago. And the meat off the mammoths is fed to the sled dogs in the Yukon and north.
2007-08-12 15:17:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Impossible.
The bones, which are in Germany, are about 210-million years old. Humans didn't get to Germany until 30,000 - 40,000 years ago.
2007-08-12 15:13:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sandy G 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
If they're not there, the creationists will "invent" some.
Oh goody, send them to the Creation Museum. Lets give the world more evidence to think we are religious morons over here
2007-08-12 15:10:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It would throw a big curve into both creationism and evolution to find human bones there, wouldn't it?
2007-08-12 15:13:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Meow 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Would that be so shocking? After all, God created man to live among the beasts. What is your point?
2007-08-12 15:15:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋