I want evidence from you "naysayers" who don't believe in the ...?

Question

perfection of the canon of scripture. To the ones who say Paul is a false Apostle,and all of his teachings wrong(You're probably legalists),to say that is to say the Bible is false.What is your criteria?I think Paul was a very special guy who lead us out of the Old Testament into the New,as John the Baptist lead us from Moses to Jesus.The denominations have chosen to push Paul back and bring the legalistic Peter to the forefront.What say y'all?

Answer 1

You can't pick and choose from the Bible what to believe. Paul's epistles are part of the Bible and we have to accept what he has written as a vessel of the Lord. If someone gave you a box of the most delicious chocolates, would you throw away the chocolates and eat the box? Paul was merely an instrument to bring us God's Word and complete the canon of Scripture. If we reject what Paul has written we are rejecting God's Word. And we do that to our own detriment.

Answer 2

I say that, if Paul was the false apostle, he is the only one worth trusting of the lot. In fact, I think we need the parts of the Bible that are not suspect in one manner or another to be removed and replaced with the ramblings of the evangelical speakers of the past 200 years. Then, and only then, will the Bible be as it was meant to be: An instruction book on everything that God wants you to ignore.

Answer 3

So, are you saying that one version of the Goat Herders' Guide to the Galaxy is better than another version of Goat Herders' Guide to the Galaxy OR are you saying one of the ImaginaryPlayers in the fictional Goat Herders' Guide to the Galaxy is better than one of the other ImaginaryPlayers?
It was a rhetorical question – I have no interest in an answer.

Hey, whatever your thrall – goodonya mate.
I have no axe to grind in the ImaginarySkyPixie debate or it's Dogma, Doctrines, Rituals or other stuff y'all need for your amusement as a means of escaping reality.
As Frank Sinatra said: Basically, I'm for anything that gets you through the night - be it prayer, tranquilizers or a bottle of Jack Daniels.

Answer 4

You know, I was at my mother's house one day and she was watching a religious program. The preacher began to pray, thanking God for giving us such specific and clearly defined rules! I almost rolled on the floor! Such specific rules have led to a state where there are 300 different forms of the Baptist church alone, not to mention all the other warring factions that claim that THEY are the only real religion. Judging by the results alone I consider it imperfect, and there are plenty of other reasons, too.

Answer 5

The canon was decided by men, and they fought over including of some of the books for many many years... learn some history.

Answer 6

OT and NT agree!!! The OT speaks about JESUS and HIS ministry! Read about the sanctuary and the feast days.

Paul and Peter, BOTH, were lead by the HOLY SPIRIT! How can you say otherwise?

GOD bless

Answer 7

Paul was a cold blooded killer before he even became christian. He killed thousands by all kinds of means when his name was Saul. I think "naysayers" do not have to show proof, I think it's up to believers of of the impossible to prove their side.
I am an agnostic.

Answer 8

The end result is still a childish, illogical cult. I coudn't care less about the details at this level.

Answer 9

Go Paul.

Answer 10

I think Paul was cool especially since he was a boxer.
I say let the Churches fight. It doesn't mean a thing to me.