English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qa7PN-8T2VY

Also watch the 9/11 Mysteries movie, and Loose Change, at:

http://www.truth911.net

http://www.seeloosechange.com

http://www.stj911.org

http://www.physics911.net

http://www.journalof911studies.org

http://www.prisonplanet.com/911.html

WHAT WOULD YOU DO IF YOU LEARNED THAT ALMOST
EVERYTHING YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD ABOUT MUSLIM
TERRORISM OVER THE LAST 6 YEARS, WERE ALL LIES?

Why don't you do your own independent research to find out
the REAL truth?

You have been told to fight in a war on terror - this is a LIFE &
DEATH MATTER! Don't you owe it to yourself, to check that
what you are being told is really 100% correct, 100% true,
100% accurate and consistent with the real FACTS? (and not
just some neo-con war monger's opinion?)

FACTS:

Melting point of steel = 1532 C
(molten steel was filmed dripping out of the South Tower)

Jet fuel fire temperature in still air = 233-250 C
(use a pyrometer for proof)

2007-08-11 11:59:59 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Engineering

Do you really think that over 80,000 tonnes of steel, can instantly weaken and become as WEAK AS AIR in around 10 seconds, as each of the Twin Towers fell? Accelerating into themselves, through the path of highest resistance, as though the lower, undamaged materials were as weak as air, providing NO STRENGTH?

How could those towers stay standing strong for 56 minutes (South Tower) and about 102 minutes (North Tower) after each getting hit by a jet plane?

How could the burnt up jet fuel (which was mostly consumed in the initial explosive fireballs) heat up steel beyond its melting point (over 1532 C), to cause a molten metal waterfall, and huge pools of molten metal which kept Ground Zero red hot (at temperatures over 600 C) up to 6 weeks after 9/11 ?

How can jet fuel from each plane, which burns at about 250 C in still air (not high speed air) heat up the rubble to over 600 C and keep it this hot for over 6 weeks? Do you know any plane that can
fly for this long?

2007-08-11 12:05:47 · update #1

IF YOU KEEP ON BELIEVING THE
LIES ON TV & FROM YOUR "NEWS"
PROPAGANDA SERVICES, YOU
ARE GIVING YOUR POWER TO
NEFARIOUS & DECEPTIVE, GREEDY
WAR-PROFITEERS & MURDERERS
WHO SIMPLY KEEP USING 9/11 AS
AN EXCUSE TO LOOT & PILLAGE OIL
RICH COUNTRIES, LIKE PIRATES...

The majority of people GIVE THEM THE
POWER THEY NEED BY DOING ALL
THEIR DIRTY WORK, DYING IN WARS
FOR PROFIT... just by believing in lies...

Be careful what you believe in... or you
might later regret your course of action,
just like most Germans did, who followed
Adolf Hitler into "no win" wars of
conquest... You don't have to DIE to
defend a lie, a total fabrication, or an
idea of "freedom" based on false
premises and deceptions designed to
hide the true motives and intentions of
those who simply want to "get rich quick"
through imperialistic piracy (ie. big
reconstruction contracts, arms supplies
and control of oil fields)...

You don't have to believe in lies and give
liars power over you!!

2007-08-11 12:14:12 · update #2

IF YOU KEEP ON BELIEVING THE
LIES ON TV & FROM YOUR "NEWS"
PROPAGANDA SERVICES, YOU
ARE GIVING YOUR POWER TO
NEFARIOUS & DECEPTIVE, GREEDY
WAR-PROFITEERS & MURDERERS
WHO SIMPLY KEEP USING 9/11 AS
AN EXCUSE TO LOOT & PILLAGE OIL
RICH COUNTRIES, LIKE PIRATES...

The majority of people GIVE THEM THE
POWER THEY NEED BY DOING ALL
THEIR DIRTY WORK, DYING IN WARS
FOR PROFIT... just by believing in lies...

Be careful what you believe in... or you
might later regret your course of action,
just like most Germans did, who followed
Adolf Hitler into "no win" wars of
conquest... You don't have to DIE to
defend a lie, a total fabrication, or an
idea of "freedom" based on false
premises and deceptions designed to
hide the true motives and intentions of
those who simply want to "get rich quick"
through imperialistic piracy (ie. big
reconstruction contracts, arms supplies
and control of oil fields)...

You don't have to believe in lies and give
liars power over you!!

2007-08-11 12:14:19 · update #3

By the way, I am an engineering professor with a PhD who lectures in materials and product design for a living at University level.

Check my facts... do it for yourself if you
don't believe me!

Try to melt steel with just an open air
fire (even a jet fuel or kerosene fire),
where still air is the only source of O2
(oxygen).

Measure the flame temperature with an
accurate thermocouple sensor or a
foundry pyrometer instrument... The
temperature in an air fire does not
exceed 250 C.

Even the temperature of fire from paper
burning in air, is Fahrenheit 451, where
451 F = 233 C. Not even hot enough to
start weakening steel (which only begins
to lose a little strength at 300 C). At
about 650 C, steel is at about half of its
top strength, and those buildings had an
overdesign strength redundancy of 6x
or 600% safety factor. The could handle
6x more weight than the maximum load
capacity.

The Twin Towers stood strong & stable
56-102 minutes after being hit!

2007-08-15 11:44:17 · update #4

Now think about this...

Why is it that controlled demolition
experts NEVER USE KEROSENE OR
JET FUEL AIR FIRES to completely
demolish highrise buildings?

Why?

BECAUSE IT JUST DOESN'T WORK!

THEY NEED TO USE STEEL CUTTER
CHARGES (EXOTHERMIC CHEMICAL
REACTIONS TO CUT STEEL) PLUS
DEMOLITION EXPLOSIVES TO FULLY
DESTROY BUILDINGS DOWN TO THE
GROUND FLOORS!

THE ONLY OTHER WAY A STEEL
FRAME BUILDING CAN COLLAPSE IS
FROM EARTHQUAKES, AND NO
STEEL BUILDING HAS EVER FALLEN
COMPLETELY TO THE GROUND IN
THE HISTORY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO THE HEAT
OF A FUEL-FED AIR FIRE.... NONE!

WATCH THIS MOVIE CAREFULLY...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qa7PN-8T2VY

Then watch 9/11 Mysteries...

http://www.truth911.net

2007-08-15 11:47:28 · update #5

6 answers

Thanks for the spam. I didn't read all your junk. But here are two facts for you too.

Fact metal doesn't have to be at the melting point to fail.

Fact there is no "still air" at the middle of a skyscraper ,there is lots of wind.

2007-08-11 12:22:02 · answer #1 · answered by Yoho 6 · 2 0

ok well not that I think you'll listen but here goes an explanation for how jet fuel can burn hot enough to melt steel

if you have ever seen a forest fire - ok wood burns at somewhat lower temp than jet fuel but when a forest fire gets big it super heats - it gets very very hot - and the heat is rising so much so that it sucks in enough air to create a mini-weather system that can be tracked from space -

so applying the same theory to wtc - jet plane crashed into building jet fuel gets spewed everywhere and ignites everything (not just the jet fuel) the fire heats up the the point that the steel starts to fail - and soon it heats up enough that the steel melts - even though i am not an expert - i am smart (probably more than the originator of the question) and this makes sense to me

you doubt the experts that answer your posts but you don't post your credentials or the credentials of the individual(s) that have convinced you of this theory

perhaps you could give me an explanation as to why someone would fake this - hell i can think of about one million other ways to start a war without killing thousands of innocent civilians - hell blow up an embassy - that'll get you a war with the US - I just can't see the motivation here

2007-08-14 15:26:02 · answer #2 · answered by lancej0hns0n 4 · 0 0

This is really not the place for this type of question but in partial answer:
The support structure on the outside of the towers was tubular steel, the fire went in through the breaks in the tubular steel columns and created a chimney effect which supported very rapid combustion.
Steel looses its strength fairly quickly once it passes about 400 C. Ask any black smith or knife maker.
When the first section above the failure point dropped a about 3 meters it impacted with the force of dropping a bunch locomotives the same distance, adding a few more hundred tons for every floor that was added to the falling mass.
Hopefull this handles most of the physics of the incident for you.

2007-08-11 23:10:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You have to be kidding, right?????

Otherwise

I thought that all you guys had shaved your heads, moved to the wilds of Idaho where the government can't find you, and were now all waiting for an alien spacecraft to come along and carry you off to some far planet where no one will harass you every time you crawl out from under your rock.

2007-08-11 20:01:22 · answer #4 · answered by gatorbait 7 · 1 0

One should never believe lies, and should take the ramblings of fools with a grain of salt.

2007-08-12 02:57:48 · answer #5 · answered by tinkertailorcandlestickmaker 7 · 1 0

I only one thing to say Charley Sheen is a good actor. That is pretty much where it stops. Please don't waste any more of my time with your stupid conspiracy theory sh**.

2007-08-13 00:22:14 · answer #6 · answered by Scott S 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers