English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-08-11 11:18:02 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

lol Pangel, you know I don't mean this literally. I'm wondering if there is some sad person who will actually agree with it.

2007-08-11 11:24:17 · update #1

gidgit, blame George Bush Sr, he's the one who thought that way.

2007-08-11 11:24:46 · update #2

9 answers

* rolls eyes *
oh no they are stuck ... I have rolled them too far this time !!!!

lol babe the way you worded it , sounds like you are literally meaning it
reword it and blame Bush then

2007-08-11 11:22:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

The "under god" phrase was not in the original pledge of allegiance. It was added in the 1950s because Americans were scared of the communists who did not, for the most part, believe in any gods.

If you believe as former president George HW Bush did when he was quoted that atheists should not have the right to be citizens, you are entitled to this discriminatory view. However, it probably will be best to keep in mind that most atheists abide by the law (more so than christians, in proportion, judging by the incarcerated population), and some atheists also serve in the armed forces to defend this country.

If christians decide that atheists should not be allowed to be citizens, converting the founding fathers' original intent (freedom of religion also means freedom from religion), I think they will find a large resistance against theocracy.

2007-08-11 18:27:42 · answer #2 · answered by CC 7 · 2 0

Looks like you've been talking to dubya's daddy...

Know that the original pledge of allegiance was written ~without~ the words "under god" in it. The Eisenhower administration added that during the cold war to emphasize the difference between America and the Communists of the USSR.

By law anyone born within the borders of the United States is granted citizenship.

2007-08-11 18:25:55 · answer #3 · answered by genaddt 7 · 3 0

Yes to me it is just like when Joshua was leading the Israelites.He said in Joshua 24:15

15And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.

2007-08-11 18:28:45 · answer #4 · answered by Bobby Cow 4 · 0 1

It's not one nation under god. That's why we need to get that crap off our money and out of the pledge.

2007-08-11 18:28:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Ok you get top marks for the dumbest question of the day.

oh, thank goodness this didn't originate from someone with some intelligence, lol

2007-08-11 18:24:03 · answer #6 · answered by carpathian mage 3 · 2 3

That is a very stupid question. Jesus would disagree with I do believe. He said he loves everyone, and would not deny anyone.

2007-08-11 18:24:53 · answer #7 · answered by David L 5 · 1 2

I guess that would eliminated anyone else who also doesn't believe in your "christian" god, then, doesn't it.

2007-08-11 18:24:00 · answer #8 · answered by Sapere Aude 5 · 1 0

you're right...they should be deported! lol

2007-08-11 18:32:46 · answer #9 · answered by holly B 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers