Why even assume? It's illogical to assume?
Do Buddhists believe in a creator god?
No, we do not. There are several reasons for this. The Buddha, like modern scientists, sociologists and psychologists, believed that religious ideas and especially the god idea have their origins in fear. The Buddha says:
"Gripped by fear men go to sacred mountains, sacred groves, sacred trees and shrines." *Dhammpada 188
Primitive man found himself in a dangerous and hostile world, the fear of wild animals, of not being able to find enough food, of injury or disease, and of natural phenomena like thunder, lightning and volcanoes was constantly with him. Finding no security, he created the idea of god in order to give him comfort in good times, courage in times of danger and consolation when things went wrong. To this day, you will notice that people become more religious at times of crises, you will hear them say that the belief in a god or gods gives them the strength they need to deal with life. You will hear them explain that they believe in a particular god because they prayed in time of need and their prayer was answered. All this seems to support the Buddha’s teaching that the god-idea is a response to fear and frustration. The Buddha taught us to try to understand our fears, to lessen our desires and to calmly and courageously accept the things we cannot change. He replaced fear, not with irrational belief but with rational understanding.
The second reason the Buddha did not believe in a creator god is because there does not seem to be any evidence to support this idea. There are numerous religions, all claiming that they alone have god’s words preserved in their holy book, that they alone understand god’s nature, that their god exists and that the gods of other religions do not. Some claim that god is masculine, some that she is feminine and others that it is neuter. They are all satisfied that there is ample evidence to prove the existence of their god but they laugh in disbelief at the evidence other religions use to prove the existence of another god. It is not surprising that with so many different religions spending so many centuries trying to prove the existence of their gods that still no real, concrete, substantial or irrefutable evidence has been found. Buddhists suspend judgement until such evidence is forthcoming.
The third reason the Buddha did not believe in a creator god is that the belief is not necessary. Some claim that the belief in a god is necessary in order to explain the origin of the universe. But this is not so. Science has very convincingly explained how the universe came into being without having to introduce the god-idea. Some claim that belief in god is necessary to have a happy, meaningful life. Again we can see that this is not so. There are millions of Atheists, free-thinkers and Buddhists, who live useful, happy and meaningful lives without belief in a creator god. Some claim that belief in god’s power is necessary because humans, being weak, do not have the strength to help themselves. Once again, the evidence indicates the opposite. One often hears of people who have overcome great disabilities and handicaps, enormous odds and difficulties through their own inner resources, through their own efforts and without belief in a god. Some claim that god is necessary in order to give man salvation. But this argument only holds good if you accept the theological concept of salvation and Buddhists do not accept such a concept. Based on his own experience, the Buddha saw that each human being had the capacity to purify the mind, develop infinite love and compassion and perfect understanding. He shifted attention from the heavens to the heart and encouraged us to find solutions to our problems through self-understanding.
But if there is no creator god how did the universe get here?
All religions have myths and stories which attempt to answer this question. In ancient times, when man simply did not know, such myths were adequate, but in the 20th century, in the age of physics, astronomy and geology, such myths have been superseded by scientific fact. Science has explained the origin of the universe without recourse to the god-idea.
.
2007-08-14 08:10:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Thomas 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
geez, you seem to have gone through a lot of trouble to prove you have faith. why not just say you have faith and be done with. ok, i only got as far as reading your first explanation, so i'll start with that and just assume that the rest of your arguements are as lame as that. on the the professor having a brain... unless you're a complete moron, you know that human beings cannot function without a brain. obviously, since this is the professor of a university, i'd assume he/she would have had to meet some form of academic requirement. that would have been impossible without a brain. the same cannot be said for the existence of a god. and please spare me the watchmaker story. i'll cut you off right there and ask, who made the watchmaker? he had to come from somewhere too, didn't he? the true religions are the ones we can keep to ourselves.
2016-05-19 22:56:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Buddhism... it's the one of the few whose followers don't kill, threaten, or oppress those that don't believe as they do. If there is a god, I'm sure he's disgusted by the behavior of the followers of the Abrahamic religions.
Edit: Oh yeah, good answer Szandrah. I forgot about Shinto and Taoism.
2007-08-11 07:43:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Solarcide 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
I don't think any such religion exists today, if it ever did. I personally think God would be critical of organized religion.
2007-08-11 09:02:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by valkyria 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
His religion would be His favorite. The rest of the religions draw near to Him with their mouths, but their hearts are far from Him. It's the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.
2007-08-11 07:40:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Taoism or shinto probably. They are much based on simple truths and common sense and would appeal to Gods taste for free will.
2007-08-11 07:37:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Islam
2007-08-11 07:39:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by mallak s 2
·
0⤊
5⤋
Baptist of course.Why? They teach and proclaim his word.We don't call him a liar by
saying his word has mistakes as the heathen do.
2007-08-11 07:39:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
amen
2007-08-11 10:08:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by nanny411 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
If he had a sense of humor, Scientology.
...aliens.....
2007-08-11 07:41:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Darth Cheney 7
·
1⤊
2⤋