Thank you DNA! (and if you got the double reference there, you are a geek and my brother)
2007-08-10 10:17:00 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
meshugga: right you are. It should be able to signify its approval for maximum satire.
2007-08-10 10:22:40 · update #1
OH! An Ameglian Major Cow! Cool! Can we actually make one?
Remember it must not only want to be eaten, but be able to express that desire.
2007-08-10 10:21:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
No...Genetic engineering is neither good nor evil.
Genetic engineering; The manipulation or alteration of the genetic structure of a single cell or organism.
"Mutations exist as a result of the Fall. We know the serpent was cursed, Eve was cursed, and Adam was cursed (Gen. 3:14-19). But Romans 8:18-22 also tells us that all creation was subjected to futility, groans and suffers, and eagerly awaits the revealing of the sons of God so it may be set free from its slavery to corruption. This world is not as God intended."
"Part of the Christian mission has always been to alleviate suffering where possible. While Jesus' miracles clearly were part of fulfilled prophecy, they were also about relief from suffering. Genetic engineering, while possessing a power that can be used for evil, also at least has the potential to relieve the suffering from, if not even cure, genetic disease.....
2007-08-10 10:42:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Thank you, Douglas Noel Adams.
Four steaks, rare! -"The Restaurant at the End of the Universe"
(I may be a geek, but I'm an only child.)
2007-08-10 10:22:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Not so much an afterlife, more of an apres-vie.
You've touched a good spot.. Only some of the responders are so unhip it's a wonder that...
And remember some vegetables have very firm views on the subject.
2007-08-10 10:26:48 · answer #4 · answered by Pedestal 42 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No I nonetheless would not consume meat. You assume that all and sundry vegans and vegetarians do no longer consume meat for ethical motives. some do no longer consume meat with the aid of fact they do no longer purely like the flavor of meat in any respect. And there are some that are allergic to maximum meats and meat products. i in my opinion do no longer purely like the flavor or texture of meats, therefor i'd nonetheless say no if I have been asked by using an animal.
2016-10-09 23:03:44 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Immoral? sounds delicious!
2007-08-10 10:57:36 · answer #6 · answered by Don't Fear the Reaper 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Both references went right over my head, but I like the question.
2007-08-10 10:24:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Douglas Adams rules!! And he has a table waiting for us at Milliways!!
2007-08-10 10:53:25 · answer #8 · answered by . 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
seems I am not a geek lol
how would an animal give permission ?
light just went off !!
I get you now
it would be immoral
2007-08-10 10:21:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Meet the meat? =0)
2007-08-10 10:22:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋