Science conclued long ago that there is no logical basis for regarding the existence of God as provable or disprovable; the whole question lies more in the domain of metaphysics than physics anyway. These "atheists" haven't got a leg to stand on and they know it. That's why they're so shrill and depend so heavily of insults and harassments. They can't make any point because they haven't got any point to make.
2007-08-12 07:49:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Galahad 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
If i ought to debunk atheism, i would not be an atheist. That suggested, if I have been given the damaging place in a debate on "Resolved: it somewhat is clever to have self assurance God would not exist", i'd use a version of the cosmological argument in fieri. it somewhat is, i'd argue that a finite universe ought to have a popular reason - in spite of each thing, why ought to existence purely start up for no reason?
2016-10-09 23:00:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The burden of proof is with the one making the claim. Christians claim their god exists. they must prove it for anyone else to believe. Atheists claim they do not believe in the Christian's god. Their proof can be found within the bible's many contradictions, historical inaccuracies, and unfullfilled prophecies. This does not mean they are saying there is no god. There very well may be a god -just not the god of the Christians.
2007-08-10 10:05:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Sure, your god is easy to disprove. Your god's attributes are perfection, omnipotence, omnipresence, and loving. In the holy book your god mentions it is jealous. Jealousy is a flaw thereby not making it perfect.
Omnipotence: which means knowing what will occur long before it even happens. You god knew Satan would be evil and chose to still create it anyway. Why exactly would your all knowing god create something that it would knew would rebel and would attempt to overthrow it? Then again why would your god make the very easy incorrect moral choice? Either your god is quite foolish in which case it couldn't be all knowing or your god is very evil. Either way it shows your god doesn't have those attributes.
Your god is not in hell. Therefore it is not omnipresent.
Your god has been debunked. Next.
2007-08-10 10:08:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by meissen97 6
·
0⤊
4⤋
They don't have a shred of evidence "debunking" Christianity or they obviously would "share" - in which case there would be no controversy. Not there really is. Catholics have two billion members. It would not appear this old '20s back of tricks is fooling anyone.
2007-08-10 10:49:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Google "Burden of Proof".
Read carefully.
Never post this nonsense again.
The atheists here have thoroughly debunked the claim that there is a god. You can still believe on the basis of faith, but if you had any evidence at all, we'd have seen it long ago, and you wouldn't be posting the kind of invalid argument you just posted.
2007-08-10 10:03:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
3⤋
The atheists and other non-believers always want to turn it to the Christians to prove God is Real,, All they have to do is read the Bible.. they like to say that its full of fairly tails and what-nots,, but the people that are written about in the Bible ARE real people,,Adam and Eve were real people,, Noah, was real,Jesus was real,, The land was real, and is still there,, the people were real,, the stories are real,, The Word of God is Real...
2007-08-10 10:21:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by dolphinchic 3
·
5⤊
2⤋
You;re claiming that something exists without providing any evidence. The burden of proof is on you, not on atheists to prove a negative.
2007-08-10 10:06:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
I haven't heard any "proof" that there is a God.
2007-08-10 10:09:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Christians already have the Bible. I don't know what more proof that God isn't real I can give them.
2007-08-10 10:06:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋