English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

From the Desk of:
Steve Elliott, Grassfire.org

+ + This may explain why President Bush is
pushing the amnesty agenda. -- Steve

Kevin,

If you have been scratching your head trying to figure out
why President Bush has pushed so hard for amnesty, here's
your "smoking gun."

An effort is underway to create a North American "framework"
that will all but eliminate hard borders between Mexico,
the U.S. and Canada. This "framework" includes a "trusted
travelers" program that allows "citizens of North America"
to move freely within the three countries.

No wonder the President is pushing amnesty!

On August 20-21, President Bush will join Mexican President
Calderon and Canadian Prime Minister Harper for the second
Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) summit.

The SPP is what many believe to be the beginnings of the
infrastructure for the North American Union. The SPP's
stated goal is to:

"...Consolidate our action into a North American
framework to confront security and economic challenges,
and promote the full potential of our people, addressing
disparities and increasing opportunities for all."

This tri-lateral agreement already has resulted in regulatory
changes and open borders initiatives that clearly undermine
our sovereignty. The SPP is the one touting the "trusted
travelers" program to encourage migration of "citizens of
North America."

+ + Petition opposing a North American Union

Today, Grassfire is launching a national petition formally
opposing these and other efforts to create a North American
"framework" and undermine our nation's sovereignty.

I want to rally 100,000 signers before the SPP meetings this
month and have them on hand in Canada as part of a building
citizen protest against such efforts.

Please go here for more information and to sign:

http://www.grassfire.org/89/petition.asp?RID=12041632

+ + Exclusive interview with author Jerome Corsi

New York Times bestselling author Jerome Corsi just completed
a new book detailing our government's rapid move toward a
North American "union." It's called "The Late Great USA."

Corsi agreed to record a special interview "briefing" on the
NAU for our Grassfire team members. Go here to listen to
that interview and to access Grassfire’s detailed backgrounder
on the NAU and the NAFTA superhighway:

http://www.grassfire.org/89/petition.asp?RID=12041632

Kevin, of course the President denies that the SPP
is a precursor to a North American "Union." But there is
mounting evidence that the SPP is creating precisely that
structure -- all without any congressional oversight!

Will you help me rally 100,000 citizens before this latest
SPP meeting convenes -- in less than two weeks?

Please sign and then forward this message to your entire email network.

Thanks in advance,

Steve Elliott, President
Grassfire.org

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
(Note: Please do not "reply" directly to this e-mail message. This
e-mail address is not designed to receive your personal messages.
To contact Grassfire.org with comments, questions or to change
your status, see links at the end.)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

+ + + + +
Grassfire.org Alliance is a non-profit 501(c)4 issues advocacy
organization dedicated to equipping our 1.5 million-strong
network of grassroots conservatives with the tools that give
you a real impact on the key issues of our day. Gifts to
Grassfire.org are not tax deductible.

+ + To comment on this update, go here:
(not for technical questions)

http://www.firesociety.com/comments/16411

+ + For technical questions, go here:

http://www.grassfire.org/techemail.asp?ind=15

-------------------------------------------
For Mr. Kevin Gray to unsubscribe, please click:
http://www.grassfire.net/unsubscribe_form.asp?CID=142&RID=12041632&F=89
-------------------------------------------

You are signed up as: revolt22@cox.net To change your email address:
Change
email

2007-08-10 09:08:09 · 17 answers · asked by **tu<3nina** 3 in Politics & Government Immigration

THANX FOR UR SUPPORT...I AM ALL FOR HELPING PEOPLE THAT ARE ALREADY HERE...BUT IMAGINE THE CHAOS????

2007-08-10 10:25:24 · update #1

17 answers

i got the same email this morning, i was going to post it my self. glad some one did. thanks. the spp means the mexican president, American president and the canadian president. they do not care what their citizens think. mexico will be the only country to benefit from this mess.

2007-08-10 09:17:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6 3

Traditionally I would say Japan or Mexico, their crowds are more consistant (WWE has lost a great deal of their audience, in the late 90's they were getting three times the ratings....and WCW was getting the same or better depending on the time frame.......) In the current market, Japanese Wrestling (puroresu) has been down. Alot of this can be attributed to the 'americanizing' of All Japan Pro Wrestling. I would say right now Mexico.

2016-05-19 01:07:51 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

I have heard this before. But Canada will not join borders with the US. They do not want to be the same country as the US.
And since the US is talking about putting up a big wall between the US & Mexico. I don't think this is possible.
This was in a big discussion 2 years ago but stop with Canada said no.
So No I don't think that it will happen.

2007-08-10 09:25:03 · answer #3 · answered by c_greiff 3 · 2 1

Yes, this is the reason that Bush wants amnesty. If Bush had pushed the Senate Amnesty bill through Congress, then it would have made it much easier to convince Americans to support a union with Canada and Mexico. I wouldn't mind a union with Canada, but it would be suicidal for Canada and the USA to form a union with a third world country like Mexico that is run by a corrupt govt. Say No to The North American Union!

Grassfire is a conservative political organization that has nothing to do with racist organizations like the KKK, the Brown Berets, or mecha.

2007-08-10 09:22:47 · answer #4 · answered by Shane 7 · 5 4

I don't see the need to create a North American framework because as far as I can tell all the Mexicans are already in the US.

2007-08-10 09:20:13 · answer #5 · answered by Golf Alpha Nine-seven 3 · 3 1

The only one benefited from such union would be America. America never does anything unless it enriches them more or makes them more powerful. Foreign "aid" is not an altruistic thing whatsoever, just another way to expand the empire.

2007-08-10 09:43:43 · answer #6 · answered by Siervocal 4 · 5 4

I really, really doubt it. Canada is run so much more efficiently than us, why in the world would they ruin it?

2007-08-10 15:21:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

i signed. we really need to get in touch with our state reps and let them know we do not want this. call everyday, 3 or 4 times aday.

2007-08-10 10:00:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

CLinton's began this in 1994. Too late. The only battle is WHO is going to run it. Choose your battles carefully.

2007-08-10 09:15:45 · answer #9 · answered by Thomas Paine 5 · 4 2

Old news. This began under Bill Clinton, but I can't imagine it will ever come to fruition.

2007-08-10 09:22:50 · answer #10 · answered by Leah 6 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers