Do American Christians reject evolution because biologists use the metric system?

Answer 1

You are making a huge assumption there. I bet most of them don't know that scientists use the metric system.

Answer 2

I don't know about that,but what I do know is that Biology would still flourish even if Darwin hadn't thought up evolution.
‘Comparative physiology and comparative genomics have certainly been fruitful, but comparative biology originated before Darwin and owes nothing to his theory. Before the publication of The Origin of Species in 1859, comparative biology focused mainly on morphology, because physiology and biochemistry were in their infancy and genomics lay in the future; but the extension of a comparative approach to these sub-disciplines depended on the development of new methodologies and instruments, not on evolutionary theory and immersion in historical biology.’
Dr. Philip Skell

Answer 3

No, they reject it because the only book they have ever read was the bible, and the bible contains zero science.

DH is a perfect example, he knows nothing about evolutionary biology, though he tries really hard to sound like he does. If he had actually read a science book, then he would know what he was talking about, and he would not sound completely ignorant like he does now.

Answer 4

that's the clocks, around clocks. do away with them, flow metric, and digital. The day ought to have one hundred units, approximately quarter-hour long. Evolution might no longer be familiar, as long a guy clings to that is around clocks.

Answer 5

No mainly because - a major problem for evolution is the huge increase in information content of organisms through time. Evolutionary theory accepts additions and deletions of information as evidence of evolution of a population. The problem is that through the imagined history of life on earth, the information content of the genomes of organisms must have increased dramatically. Beginning with the most primitive form of life, we have a relatively simple genome compared to the genomes that we see today. Mutations are said to provide the fuel for the evolutionary engine. Virtually all observed mutations result in a loss in the information content of a genome. There would need to be some way to consistently add information to the genome to arrive at palm trees and people from a simple single-celled organism—the hypothetical common ancestor of all life on earth. Evolutionists have failed to answer the question, “Where did all the new information come from since mutations are known to reduce information?” You cannot expect evolution, which requires a net gain in information over millions of years, to occur as a result of mutation and natural selection. Natural selection, evolution’s supposed mechanism, causes a loss of information and can only act on traits that are already present.

Answer 6

No, I do not reject evolution bcoz biologists use the metric system. I don't believe it bcoz I know that God created the Universe.
Genesis 1:1
''In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.''

Answer 7

I would like to believe they are not THAT irrational. But who knows? I looked at a bunch of photos of the creation museum, and now I'm afraid anything is possible.

Answer 8

You know, I wouldn't mind the metric system if it used feet and inches...

;0)

Answer 9

I don't know abou that. A lot of chrisitan creationists go to those megachurches. That sounds metric to me...

Answer 10

Have you seen the American Public Education system at work? That's why.

I will ring your doorbell and run away!!!