Wow, read on and it shows what a whacko people like Daly really are. He accuses Savage of being a racist for a number of comments involving a group of students who were fasting to advocate for immigration policy changes. Savage said, “I would say, let them fast until they starve to death, then that solves the problem.”
he didn't say anything about race. Always gotta try and stir up trouble and point the hatred finger.
Daly's gotta go And not just from office. Let's let one immigrant take his citizenship for free and we'll deport him to Malaysia.
2007-08-10 05:41:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Some dude 4
·
6⤊
0⤋
We keep hearing that immigrates give so much more than they get back, if they can not pay their own way, should we really be subsidizing their fees for citizenship. Once they become citizens then they will be able to really access all of our social welfare programs, is this the way to run a country. I say we hang out in the parking lot a see what type of cars these would be citizens drive to see if they really need help or just looking for a hand out. Daily want to have a new department to over see the subsiding the fees, that would cost more than the fee to be a citizen, in that case just give the immigrates the money, it would be cheaper than a new layer of bureaucracy
2007-08-10 05:52:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by jean 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
OK someone who is applying for a green card is usually here in the States on a valid work visa and is legal. To have a work visa you must be paying taxes just like everyone else, so why can't these service be available to LEGAL immigrants?
America give enough services to illegals. Why not help the people who are here and have followed the law to gain entry to the States?
2007-08-10 07:59:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mama~peapod 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
An unlawful immigrant can pass away the U. S. and attempt to come back back legally. of direction that technique could be swifter in the event that they hadn't been illegally in the U. S. in the 1st place... the technique of immigrating legally should not be extra troublesome than the technique of having felony after unlawful presence in the U. S.. otherwise, why could definitely each physique issue to come back legally? probably infants who have been further via their dad and mom may be the 1st applicants, as that they had no decision in the issue - regardless of the indisputable fact that they had to decision leaving whilst they have been adults. the priority is that maximum of them does no longer qualify at 18, and giving them conditional rights until eventually they finished their training could additionally bring about a large number for all people who finally end up no longer qualifying. Nor specific if a protracted era of uncertainty is somewhat extra effective for human beings than sparkling regardless of the indisputable fact that troublesome data. a extra effective way could be to ensure that e.g. agricultural employer do no longer hire illegals yet get their workers applicable visa. There are already visa in specific for agricultural workers, so it is not that it is not achieveable. Then they could be legally in the U. S., no longer illegally in the 1st place. massive agribusinesses are yelling that they have got not sufficient workers devoid of illegals. nicely, in the event that they could are becoming to be them visa, they nonetheless could have an analogous form of workers, purely they could have felony status - which could be plenty extra effective for the employees besides.
2016-10-02 01:19:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think he personifies the typical liberal socialist agenda. it appears that the majority of San Franciscan's agree with him and want thim to represent them and that is why he was elected.
"In June 2007, Daly announced that he was working with anti-war activist organizations such as Code Pink, Global Exchange and Veterans for Peace and considering introducing a proposal to ban the Blue Angels from flying during San Francisco's Fleet Week. Following significant negative public response and media inquiries, Daly announced that he had decided against making this proposal, blaming reporters at the San Francisco Examiner for his inability to move forward with this controversial proposal. "
2007-08-10 06:12:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
The taxpayers still subsidize our immigration office. It should charge appropriate fees so that it is self supporting.
If the citizens of San Fran want to spend their money that way, its their stupidity I guess. I can think of about 2,000 more deserving places to spend money but I don't live there - thank god. Pretty soon Cindy Sheehan will be their rep, so that area will fall off a cliff anyway.
2007-08-10 05:41:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by youarewrongbobisright 5
·
6⤊
0⤋
If he wants to use his personal money aor a fund from all the pro illegals fine, but if he is using tax payer money for that, you can bet I would be 1st in line to make a big loud stink about it. Organize, organize, organize, and be very vocal and public. Thats the only way politicians get the message, fear of being voted out of office.
2007-08-10 06:25:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by bigDcowgirl 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Caifornia is really a screwed up and Arnold did little to help. Give it to the Mexicans and the hollywood elite. When the poor mexicans are at their mansion gates screaming give me all your burritos and Carona beer then they will realize how they goofed up with their liberal whineing.
2007-08-10 07:48:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I pay myself about $400.00 last year for my citizenship...I didn't get any financial assistance so I say not to FA.
And he is so wrong doing that given Assistance...
From we as a tax payer citizens.
2007-08-10 05:38:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by nena_en_austin 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
Time to run Daly out of office.
2007-08-10 05:35:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by regerugged 7
·
8⤊
0⤋