Atheists will use logic to try and disprove God's existence, but...?

Question

in so doing, they are assuming absolute laws of logic and borrowing from the Christian worldview.

A. The Christian worldview maintains that the laws of logic are absolute because they come from God who is Himself absolute.
B. But the atheist worldview does not have an absolute God.
So, we ask, "How can absolute, conceptual, abstract laws be derived from a universe of matter, energy and motion?"
In other words, "How can an atheist with a naturalistic presupposition account for the existence of logical absolutes when logical absolutes are conceptual by nature and not physical, energy, or motion?" If the Atheist states that the laws of logic are conventions (mutually agreed upon conclusions), then the laws of logic are not absolute because they are subject to "vote."


How does the atheist account for the laws of logic?

Not "shoving" beliefs, just trying to understand and come to a greater level of knowledge, If you are interested in "educatedly" discussing this, please feel free to e-mail me.

AnArdRi-The laws of logic are not dependent upon different people's minds since people are different. Therefore, they cannot be based on human thinking since human thinking is often contradictory.

Joe F-Man, being made in God's image, is capable of discovering these laws of logic. He does not invent them.

The laws of logic are conceptual realities. They only exist in the mind and they do not describe physical behavior of things, since behavior is action and laws of logic are not descriptions of action, but of truth.

Answer 1

The atheist, regardless of how pure they feel their logic is, can not disprove God. If you can not logically prove there is a God, you can not logically prove there is not a God. God is a matter of faith, faith is not a matter of logic. Atheists, while planting their beliefs in logic, are actually using faith - faith that there is not God.

Answer 2

First of all, in science, nothing is absolute. Hence, there are no absolute, conceptual, abstract laws. I know this is difficult for you to understand but we do not try to disprove god at all. We simply look at scientific theories to explain our existence and that of the universe as opposed to the bible. We have no naturalistic presupposition. Again, we study theory.

A scientific theory is a set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted by science and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena. A theory is never a fact until it has been proven and then of course by definition it is no longer a theory.

Even some so called "facts" have been demolished by further scientific study. It was once considered “fact” that the world was flat which as we now know is ludicrous. Newton’s theory of gravity had to be more accurately explained by Einstein. That's what science does. It develops theories about the workings of the universe using what ever observable evidence is available. If new evidence is discovered it can either confirm the theory or counter the theory, sometimes to the point that it know longer is a viable theory.

Science does not know everything. We know a great deal that the faithful seem to disregard as simple argument but it is not simple argument. Our theories are not meant to disprove intelligent design or creation or anything else. In fact those concepts are not even considered in science. I would never say to a Christian that my theories disprove your beliefs. It always seems to be the Christian coming to me and saying that my theory can't be right because the bible says so. That doesn't fly in science.

Answer 3

Any person will try to justify his/her beliefs. Sometimes this will solve a personal crisis such as doubt; sometimes it is a desire to share (convince) with others. What is your?

Beliefs are just that: beliefs. There is no rational, and any rational is silly especially when our senses can not be involved.

You talk about Christianity, but Christians know where they stand. They do not need defending because God kept his promise through Jesus, and as a result, they have hope for eternal life. They have the teachings of Jesus, and his disciples are teaching all nations. They may teach but that does not mean they will convert everyone.

Rather than talk about atheists or any non Christian, focus on the bible as a tool for the believer. Remember that the bible is not a history or science book (actually scrolls), and it is not a conversion manual.

It is time to close ranks and use your best defenses. There are pastors to guide you, follow Christians to support you, and a God who loves you. This is where you should stand.

Answer: Why do you seek the living among the dead.

Answer 4

Actually, atheists are not trying to disprove god. That is impossible. Atheists are asking for proof of god. If there was a god then there should be some sort of proof available.

If a person believes in a god without any sort of proof to back it up then that person should not ever expect someone else to have the same blind belief. Remember, there are or have been hundreds (perhaps thousands) of different gods that people have believed in. You do not believe in those gods do you? There is as much proof to support those beliefs as you have to support the belief in your god.

The basic problem solving logic (the exact same of problem solving logic that has built our civilization), is to not accept a fact as being a fact until it can be proven or demonstrated in some way.

Answer 5

You are correct but the difference is that if you come up with proof of god then Science will change to be inclusive while as theological scholars look for ways to exclude and change science to fit what they think they already know. Every religion has a different view of God so by your logic then a universal deity is simply an amalgam of popular opinion transfered into cosmological terms. The laws of logic have NEVER been proved wrong however science maintains that one day they could be. It that sense i am agnostic because i don't deny the possibility that god could exist. I am just 99.99999999% sure he doesn't. Thats the beauty of science. We can change our mind. Can theist say that with confidence?

Answer 6

For the sake of argument, i'll anticipate you're some version of Judaism, Christianity, or Islam. through fact no person has countless understanding, it is impossible to coach some thing would not exist, has no longer existed, or won't exist at it sluggish, in any component of the universe or previous if the kind of place exists. Your god would not carry a monopoly on contemporary, in fact, in the hundreds of years through fact the god of Abraham became invented, no person has been waiting to coach data of his lifestyles. This fact on my own exhibits an extremely extreme possibility that your god is imaginary. are you able to coach Zeus would not exist? are you able to coach Thor would not exist? How approximately Vishnu? Apollo? Odin? Zool? Do you believe all those gods and those I did no longer point out are all sitting in the god room, indignant through fact no person believes they exist? i will purely coach that the assumption of your god is a logical impossibility. Your god is defined as being all-understanding, all-loving, and all-useful. And yet if we are responsible of the easy theory crime of disbelief, we are banished to an eternity of suffering in hell. So your all-loving, all-understanding, all-useful god created me, understanding finished nicely in strengthen that i does no longer believe, did no longer do one rattling component to coach his lifestyles (he knows of precisely what could make me believe through fact he's all-understanding) and loves me plenty that he created a place like hell purely for me and human beings like me. ok. So there, i've got used your faith to coach that your god isn't loving, thoroughly ignorant, and punctiliously powerless. Oddly adequate, those are an analogous features possessed via some thing that would not exist.

Answer 7

You truly have no sense or respect for history. People like you deserve to be ruled and governed by the people that can find a way to control you.

Just so you know, reality does not conform to religious ideas. Thats why your savior has not and will not show up. Your life will pass, and so will those of your children and their progeny, and your savior will never arrive. But you can hold your breath waiting if you want to. That's fine by me.

Answer 8

Logic is based on facts, mathematics, and truth. It exists in all societies, cultures, and worldviews. A God is not necessary to create logic, especially the Christian God. Logic is a concept, not matter. Concepts are not created. They are either invented or realized. Logic is one that is realized, not invented.

Answer 9

I have seen no evidence of the kind of God maintained by organized religion. This God, at least the Judeo-Christian version, inspired men to write the Bible, spoke to prophets, sent angelic visitations, and performed miracles. Why do we see none of that kind of action today? Why has God, so influential in the lives of people thousands of years ago, become silent? The ONLY evidence of God is stuff that could EASILY have been invented by the ancients, and not only that, all logic would dictate that it WAS.

Answer 10

Yes, we all have to assume something - Some things are axiomatic, and we just have to accept them without being able to prove them. This has nothing to do with a Christian worldview, and is not derived from such.

The laws of logic are an observation, that's why they are axiomatic - We assume that they apply in all places and in all times but we cannot prove it. An example is the law of non-contradiction, a la Jefferson - we all assume it is true, but we cannot prove it, because we would have to already assume it is true in order to make any kind of reasoned argument.

Answer 11

The laws of logic are NOT absolute because God made them. Its mathematical. Its a priori. Its analytical. I really have nothing to say.

Gosh.. Your christian worldview is nauseating me.