2007-08-09 22:12:36 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
There is nothing wrong with the human body. Although some us us including myself are better off with clothes though.
BB
2007-08-09 22:36:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hardly. We were born in our birthday suits. The only necessity for covering up is for protection from the elements and big, bird-sized mosquitoes now, not to save ourselves from feelings of lust. That's ridiculous.
I've seen plenty of naked guys and women in my time. If the men are strangers, their nudity has absolutely no affect on me, sexually, at all. Sure, I can look and think, "Nice!" but I'm not an unmanageable perv. Maybe some Christians and Muslims who blame their dirty minds on others and won't take responsibility for themselves and their libidos, should try self-control sometime!
There's nothing wrong with the human body except if a man is wearing a Speedo. Any man. One must avert one's gaze, as it is excruciatingly funny looking.
.
2007-08-09 22:38:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Mathaowny has it right.
Shame is what makes us corrupt. Shame of our own bodies.
This came from the centuries of puritanical crap that preached the fallacy of 'nudity = sex'. Patriarchal monotheism (misogynist desert god worship) gave us all this gift of horror.
Read the Malleus Maleficarum. You will see women in the light that women were seen for centuries, and you will understand why it is like it is now. Go see a woman stoned to death in an Islamic country, and understand why the men doing it (and filming it on their cell phones) are leaping around in a frenzy, when her 'cover' gets torn off her 'sinful' flesh'as she is literally smashed into pulp by rocks.
These men think *she* is shamed as they murder her. Is anything more f%%kd up than that? Here's your snuff movies right there.
They are doing nothing other than pornolizing the female and then blaming her for it and killing her. Again, read the Malleus Maleficarum to see that religious porn is the most dangerous.
Then mix in the ubiquitous porno that has made the body a cash commodity, and you get a weird mix of both ultra-fetishisizing and ultra-'shame', which is where we are now.
In truth, we shame ourselves and all life by being ashamed of who we are, and by turning ourselves into a meat market for fashion, porn, and religious woman-haters.
2007-08-09 23:19:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
As the dutchess of Windsor said in the late 1700's, if God had intended humans to be naked, they would have been born that way.
If everyone was naked, lust would not be a problem. Only when you cover the package, are men tempted to peek. Look at men on nudist beaches or topless beaches. After an hour or so, their eyes are not drawn to the women who are naked, but to those who are covered up.
To use an argument based on the bible, it wasn't until adam and eve covered up, that god punished them by throwing them out of the garden.
If Christians cast off their clothing, I'm sure their God would accept them back in eden (heaven). As they are too uptight to even consider it, only pagans will surely end up in heaven.
2007-08-09 22:24:22 · answer #4 · answered by whatotherway 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Other way around, dude... he spreads corruption by making us think impure thoughts when we see skin.
Skin is not inherently evil. Personally I don't see what Adam and Eve were hiding from. The only other one ever in the garden was God, and he'd seen them naked many times... If I were them, I would have been naked all the time!
2007-08-09 22:21:49 · answer #5 · answered by SDW 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes satans always try to tempt men and women to do the wrong things such as corruption and nudity or wearing less cloth and other bad things.Satans vowed to God that they will try hard to tempt humans until this universe will be collapsed
2007-08-09 22:30:04 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
A million and one reasons. One of those being that if it gets HOT out, we're not going around in jeans and turtlenecks. Period. I wear camis and shorts and flip-flops all summer, and I'm sorry if you think I'm looking for sex because of that, but that's YOUR problem and not mine. We'd get mad if we weren't flirting with the said guy and he just assumed because of our clothing we wanted sex. You can act like a woman and dress in shorts and tanktops and then you can act like a slut and dress in shorts and tanktops. It's the attitude that goes with the outfit that could mean we do or don't want sex.
2016-05-18 21:09:19 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because he doesn't exist.
We were all born naked. What's the problem? I think that clothes are a bigger corruption-- causing us to hate our own bodies and fear being naked or seeing another person naked when it's just a natural thing.
Get a grip on reality.
2007-08-09 22:22:12 · answer #8 · answered by mathaowny 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No he usually uses established religions to spread his corruption.
♥Blessed Be♥
♥=∞
2007-08-09 22:19:50 · answer #9 · answered by gnosticv 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Only in so far as it might encourage more extramarital sex.
There is nothing wrong with nudity itself.... It just tends to provide no convenient barriers to dissuade people from unwarranted sexual thoughts.
2007-08-09 22:15:53 · answer #10 · answered by Roger C 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋