http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20070809/sc_livescience/discoveryofmiddleasiacitiesrecastsancienthistory;_ylt=AjEEMY9ILGaxLz18uTsH2hRFeQoB
2007-08-09 14:06:48 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The Garden of Eden is thought to have been in that very region. Also Abraham was from Mesopotamia, what a coincidence, he was born in Ur; a city in ancient Sumeria. It must also be coincidence that he and Sarah were driven by famine to Egypt, somewhere along to Nile.
Wow, looks like science is starting to give proof for the Bible. Of course, this may not last long. We all know that "experts" are now going to come out of the woodwork and try to change these findings. Or discredit these scientists and their work.
2007-08-09 14:24:09 · answer #1 · answered by yahweh_is_the_lord 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I caught this thing last night on national geographic, it was pretty interesting....sadly I fell asleep before they reconstructed the face of "scientific Adam"....
but 16 million men in mongolia are directly related, that's pretty cool! They were trying to see if, because 16 million men were all descendents of Ghangus Khan(sp) if all man kind could be a descendent of "scientific Adam"
2007-08-09 21:10:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have always maintained that the bible is a book of stories that have been passed down on actual events. What is not certain, is the validity of some of the claims or the events and the goddidit. What is fairly certain is that the places did exist.
2007-08-09 21:12:51 · answer #3 · answered by punch 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I saw that today isn't it awesome? Scientists haven't had enough time to theorize it yet.
2007-08-09 21:10:35 · answer #4 · answered by Ten Commandments 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
gotta agree with the you. the bibles never wrong
2007-08-09 21:10:29 · answer #5 · answered by sonofsam 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What do you mean?
2007-08-09 21:10:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
EXACTLY.
2007-08-09 21:09:24 · answer #7 · answered by Kerilyn 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋