I haven't seen any claims to that effect. Astronomers who specialize in the origins of the universe theorize that there were evenly-spaced hydrogen atoms - enough to account for all the mass, and "something" caused gravity to begin their convergence upon one another. They massed so densely that they caused a violent explosion, known as the Big Bang, and our universe is more or less the contents of the blast shell. I haven't read much about this lately, so maybe their theories have changed. Any library will have books on cosmology, as it's called, in their astronomy section.
Edit: Radio telescopes have recorded the "echo" of the Big Bang. It is fact, even if we cannot explain every last detail concerning it.
2007-08-09 13:43:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Who Else? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You've mixed things a bit. Evolutionists aren't saying anything about the universe coming from a period sized dot.
2007-08-09 13:36:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jack P 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
actually it became smaller than a era. It became smaller than an atom, too. It became a singularity, meaning it became so infinitesimally small that it had no dimensions in any respect. opposite to what you're able to believe, there is info for it. it relatively is referred to as the great Bang theory. And in technology, "theory" potential scientists are ninety 9.9% beneficial it relatively is authentic. Oh, and it relatively is not a faith. it relatively is purely the willingness to settle for the actuality in technology and reason. there isn't any "concept" in contact, with the aid of fact it has already been shown for us, in assessment to creationism rubbish.
2016-11-11 21:49:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by blinebry 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good grief.
You can convert matter into energy.
OK
It is also possible to convert energy into matter!
And who said, (apart from you), that it was dot size?
Current theorem speculates that the universe can be traced back to its original starting point, not a dot!
Stick with your bible, if astrophysics is beyond you.
2007-08-09 13:41:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by tattie_herbert 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think...
you need to research the Law of Conservation of Matter and the Law of Conservation of Energy. And take an astronomy class while you're at it.
2007-08-09 14:11:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by bchlis 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Get some Physics 101 books.
2007-08-09 13:33:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Buttercup 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
And why couldn't it? Considering what you said, it's no wonder it blew up.
Come in? Come in where? Oh, you mean come on? As in, come on and learn how to type?
2007-08-09 13:34:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by ryoma136 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Are you bragging that you do not understand cosmology, or do you not realize that?
2007-08-09 13:40:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Fred 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your way, way off... it was the size of a marble.
2007-08-09 13:33:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by L.C. 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Please ask your science questions in the science area. Physics is not r&s.
2007-08-09 13:34:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by dddbbb 6
·
0⤊
0⤋