Or is it more like teaching talking snakes to use American sign langauge..?
2007-08-09 10:59:17 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Describing evolution to creationists is like trying to explain Quantum Physics to your neighbour's dog.
It doesn't understand a damned thing you're saying and will just carry on barking regardless.
2007-08-09 11:02:34 · answer #1 · answered by Lucid Interrogator 5 · 10⤊ 4⤋
The problem lies in the present definition of science. Before Dewey changed the philosophy of education in the US, all scientists were required to get a degree in Christian religion before persuing their scientific endeavors. After Dewey, from public schools to Universities, the definition of science has excluded the possibilities of the supernatural and extranatural.
Evolution has several parts, abiogenisis, microevolution, and macroevolution, and some include more. Abiogenisis, the formation of living matter from non living matter is no longer even addressed by modern evolutionists. Miller like experiments continue, but no biologically active result has been obtained. Microevolution is conceded by all. MInute changes within species are occurring all the time. Macroevolution, the long term transformation of one species into another has not been proven or shown credibly by any researcher. All the bones for the ascent of man trip were actually other animals made to appear as primitive men.
Until evolutionary theory can reasonably account for abiogenisis, all aother arguments are mute and moot. Why discuss biological change if you can not and do not understand biological existence?
Oh, BTW, I am a creationist.
2007-08-09 11:17:33 · answer #2 · answered by idiot 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ask yourself- Why would you whisper into the ear of a deaf person when you know they will not hear you. Do you listen when a creationist spins his spiel on you? Ever consider that both theories could be wrong or at best only partially correct. Both sides have yet to prove to me that either is right.
2007-08-09 11:32:11 · answer #3 · answered by Stella B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Creationists know they didn't come from primates or sea creatures, only evolutionists do. I'd like to see you tell an american indian in sign language hes an apes desendent. There are alot of educated idiots running amuck, it doesn't take a college degree to know the truth.
I didn't have a college education, but my children did. They are all believers, but have strayed now and then, while in college, but are all now back in His light.
2007-08-09 11:20:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the history of mankind, the progressive group of people have survived and excelled. Men sieze to exist once they aren't open to new ideas (Look at the tribals around the world, they are diminishing). The idea of evolution is newer (darwin) than the idea of creationists ( based on religions from 1000 years or older). It doesn't matter if people do not believe in evolution even when there is so much evidence in favour of it becasue that is the truth. As long as they dont want to force me to believe in creationism I am fine with them.
2007-08-09 11:14:54 · answer #5 · answered by daperdanguy 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Funny you should ask.
The whole theory of evolution is contrary to the 3rd law of thermodynamics. More and more astronomists, geologists and anthropologists are abandoning the "faith" for various and sundry reasons. Darwin himself was expressing many doubts about how the laws of logic are violated on many occasions with his theory. And, yes, many of these professionals are now more in line with an intelligent design theory of origins. So, who's deaf?
2007-08-09 11:33:31 · answer #6 · answered by Tom 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God created an evolution Gene interior the DNA of all residing issues to grant all species the potential to evolve over the years and alter into superb perfect in any habitat and environment it could desire to discover itself in, and the objective for that's to confirm the survival of species. yet so a techniques as any specie evolving into an totally distinctive specie, that has in no way ensue and it in no way will.
2016-12-15 10:32:25 · answer #7 · answered by mcarthur 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's called intellegent design... I see no reason that there has to be a conflict between religion and evolution. Do Christians really believe that their God is INCAPABLE of creating a world that works in this way? A fundamental belief is that one can not understand what God thinks and does... I figured this out when I was 12.
between science and religion... that's another story.
2007-08-09 11:08:00 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Some deaf people can hear especially with the use of hearing aids. Besides, they read body language and movement better than us hearing folk and can get the idea of what you are attempting to explain to them just from looking at you.
2007-08-09 11:03:35 · answer #9 · answered by meissen97 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Actually, it's more like trying to explain to a 4 year old, why the moon doesn't really follow him or her around when we're driving.
They simply don't have the intellectual capacity to understand.
Fortunately, most 4 year olds grow up.
Why can't creationists?
2007-08-09 11:10:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Creationists are the best example on evolution...
We need to look no farther for the missing Link!
And there are so many!
2007-08-09 11:07:15 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋