Creationists, what's your opinion on Java man, Peking man, and Lucy?

Question

Doesn't the fact that creationists cannot agree whether they are "fully ape" or "fully human" tell you something?

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/compare.html

Answer 1

java man is good - you can make some great apps with him...

peking man makes a mean roast duck...

lucy just about makes the peanuts strip worth reading...

Answer 2

Can science agree they were fully man or apes? As far as I know science still does not have the missing link and never will.

Piltdown man and the Nebraska man are two examples of how much speculation and presupposition plays a part in evolutionary thinking. Piltdown man was a hoax that fooled specialists for forty years: ape and human fossils doctored to look like they belonged together. The bones were treated with iron salts to make them look old, and the teeth filed to make them look like ape's teeth.

Nebraska Man was built up from a single tooth that later turned out to be that of a pig. Another "skull" assigned to Nebraska Man turned out to be an elephant's kneecap!

Answer 3

the common actuality that there is ongoing debate into which fossil is ape and it relatively is human would not by any potential mean that the scientific theory that guy and ape have a difficulty-unfastened genetic ancestor is bankrupt. think of of it this form; 500 years in the past the "scientific" community KNEW that the worldwide became flat and the sunlight and the celebs revolved around the earth. of course they have been incorrect as is many times the case while the religious community is in contact interior the scientific. faith is philosophy. technology is archives. they're, actual, on a similar time unique. so a strategies as i'm worried faith might desire to by no potential be blended with technology. purely with the aid of fact of a few human beings's delusional theory that as quickly with the aid of fact the sperm penetrates the egg that a special and "soul blessed" guy or woman is created would not recommend that technology might desire to come to a grinding halt. In all honesty, the hypocrisy of religion isn't any clearer then interior the argument of stem cellular study. many years in the past, while in-vitro fertilization grew to become attainable, the religious good took up hands claiming that any toddlers made in this form, exterior of the womb, may be soulless monsters constantly barred from getting into heaven. Now, there are thousand if no longer thousands and thousands of unused zygotes caught in scientific freezers throughout this usa. the final desire is to apply those "scientific leftovers" to help supply the uncooked cloth mandatory to stem cellular study. The rub is attainable interior the actuality that people who purely some years in the past have been so adamant that throughout-vitro became seen to be a blight upon gods will are actually combating to guard those very comparable "god-blights". What the heck is that each and all and sundry approximately? look, making any attempt to ever attempt to rationalize something a creationist says is consistently absolute to failure for the common actuality that all and sundry who believes that the finished universe became created in numerous days is hopelessly delusional and should be critically medicated and given each and on a daily basis doses of electroshock scientific care.

Answer 4

No Creationist will be able to give an intelligent answer, unless they admit that the very real process that is evolution does in fact go on.. and on... and on... since time immortal.

Answer 5

Don't know enough to form an opinion. Will check out the link in a bit.

Answer 6

Wow, a small human(i.e. Homo Habilis) and an ape that can walk! (i.e. Homo Homo erectus and Australopithecus)

Answer 7

The work of Satan obviously

Answer 8

Funny you don't mention piltdown man.

Answer 9

Are you trying to reason with morons? It won't work

Answer 10

They are all apes not man. YOU may have monkeys for uncles but I don't.