Does this disprove evolution?

Question

Last night I was watching a scientific documentary about evolution called "South Park." This TV show explained how evolution works, and I can't believe you evolutionarianists actually believe this tripe! And for those of you who tell me I shouldn't get my scientific knowledge from cartoons, that's where I get all my knowledge.

According to the documentary "South Park" man evolved when a bunch of fish had a retarded fish baby with hands. The fish baby went on land and mated with a squirrel to make a frog-squirrel. The frog-squirrel had a baby to make monkey-fish-frog. Then the monkey fish frog had a human baby.

How can athilutionists actually believe in this garbage? A monkey fish frog that gave birth to a baby? That's ridiculous. I can't believe you actually believe that a monkey fish frog could actually give birth to a human. What a ridiculous belief.

The documentary "South Park" proves that evolution is ridiculous. Even the main character didn't believe it.

Answer 1

Even funnier than that, though, is the bonehead (above) who refers us to Dr. Dino's web site for the 'truth'.

Answer 2

To creationists who keep up with the subject of evolution this is not news since it was already documented over a decade ago. I am glad you posted the article link. My local newspaper printed a shorter version of that article. If I had not read the longer article you linked to I would not have read that the university professor ADMITTED that, "They still have some UNDISCOVERED ancestor that PROBABLY lived 2 million to 3 million years ago, a time that has NOT LEFT MUCH FOSSIL RECORD," So you have to objectively recognize that the above statement shows that you need to have blind faith and believe that there must be some type of unknown ancestor even though there is no basis or proof of it. Evidence is not needed for much of evolutionary thought to be accepted. I always wonder why most atheists or agnostics don't just say something more honest like, " OK God does exists but I don't want to accept Him," instead of trying to convince themselves and others to accept a theory that has no observable evidence of transmutation of species and goes against the fact that main kinds of species are found fully developed together in the earliest fossil record without predecessors- the Cambrian Explosion which is never explained by evolutionists. Thanks for the post!

Answer 3

LOL, you're getting better at this all the time.

Tu Solos - Trey Parker and Matt Stone have a long history of bashing both sides equally. Ever see Team America?

Answer 4

I have noticed that the religious right insist they never evolved from lower animals.

Everyone else believes humanity developed as an intelligent species by evolving from ape-like ancestors.

I've come to the conclusion that both groups are correct. :)

Answer 5

I found it hard to figure out which point the writers were making. They bashed Dawkins, but were obviously ridiculing Mrs Garrison for her misunderstanding of the theory.

Answer 6

Lewis Grizzard once wrote a book called, "All I Really Need to Know, I Learned in Kindergarten". So, should it really be that weird that you get all your information from a cartoon? Not too weird...not too smart, but not to weird.

Answer 7

It's funnier when Mrs. Garrison (aka Richard Dawkins' monkey) says it.

Answer 8

South Park is great and hilarious. You should see the one about the Mormons and the one about Scientology.

Answer 9

Kinda makes me really scared of that time Cartman's mom said "I know a certain kitty who's sleeping with mommy tonight"!!!

Answer 10

I think this documentary got it all wrong. I'm almost positive there's a crocoduck in there somewhere.