English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070808/ap_on_sc/human_evolution;_ylt=AuMYVrisHBQL.P2zIrXajIOzvtEF
Friends why dont we stop believing in the constantly changing opinions and stop being let down by things you can't rely upon and believe the unchanging fact of creation through God and Jesus Christ. I am just showing what some fellow intellectuals have put out here, go take it up with them if you don't like it.

2007-08-09 02:02:29 · 31 answers · asked by disciple 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

31 answers

THANK YOU SO MUCH! Everytime I talk to someone who believes in Evolution they want to ignore the fact that it has more holes in it that swiss cheese and just bash God. If evolution happened like "scientists" say, then we should have 1000s of examples of humans through out history from start to now, right? But we don't! We have maybe 4 or 5 different examples and now there is proof they didnt evolve from each other!

2007-08-09 02:05:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 13

I do not believe anything, for that means to accept ideas without any evidence to support them. There is no logical evidence that any gods or Jesus really exist, but there is much evidence for evolution. Creation is a naive myth, and it is thus far from being a fact. Changing one's opinion to match new evidence is the way to know facts. Refusing to change groundless beliefs never gained anyone any real knowledge. There are disagreements about some details of evolution, but no reputable biologist doubts the obvious fact of evolution. I cannot make a watch, but I own watches and know some men can make them well. Disputes about minor details do not disprove evolution. It is quite illogical for creationists to say such a thing.

2007-08-09 02:25:06 · answer #2 · answered by miyuki & kyojin 7 · 0 0

Yes. Let us discard all knowledge gleaned over the past two and a half millennium, except that which was provided by Jesus.

Germ theory is not proven. You no longer need to wash you hands afer wiping. Germs are a lie that science has perpetuated to control you.

Numbers are not abstract. You can have three Cows, three pigs or three vestial virgins, but not just 3. Math is only to be used for counting livestock, children, wives or slaves.

Vaccines and anesthetics are satanic in nature. They prevent diseases and pain that are in God's will, and who are we to interfere with the will of God?

The crankshaft was invented by one of those heathen Musselmen, so it, too, should be abandoned. If you don't have a horse or a mule, walk. But not in Nikes or Reeboks. they take advanced physiology into account and that keeps changing. every day they have some new idea. What would Jesus wear? Yeah. bare feet or a cow hide or something, but arch support is ever-changing, so avoid it. First it was raised bits of leather then plastic and now it's "gellin' like MaGellan." New ideas are bad bad bad.

Refrigeration is unnecessary. That germ thing we talked about? Bunk. It changes all the time, too, so lets ignore it completely. As long as the smell of your food doesn't make you vomit, eat it. Bacteria? Puh-leese. Have you ever even seen a germ?

<<>>

The nice thing about science is that they change their theories to suit the evidence. Don't you wish religion did that?

This whole line of questioning honest to God (yes, I am a theist) makes me feel sick to my stomach.

2007-08-09 02:12:01 · answer #3 · answered by ZombieTrix 2012 6 · 3 0

Did you even read the article??

"Susan Anton, a New York University anthropologist and co-author of the Leakey work, said she expects anti-evolution proponents to seize on the new research, but said it would be a mistake to try to use the new work to show flaws in evolution theory.

'This is not questioning the idea at all of evolution; it is refining some of the specific points,' Anton said. 'This is a great example of what science does and religion doesn't do. It's a continous self-testing process.'"


I'm not going to tell you what you should and shouldn't believe. I'm glad that you have faith in something. Please respect me by allowing me the same courtesy.

2007-08-09 02:08:22 · answer #4 · answered by oboeduck 2 · 3 0

Wow, your question (which isnt actually a question) is very hipocrytical, there is absolutly no proof for creationism, nad the bible is not proof. But there is slight proof for evolution. And notice how people call it the Darwin THEORY, creationists dont call it the creastionism THEORY. They say its right and they are in denial that it is wrong. We are at least modest. In the next few decades, the amount of christians will decline, because there is becoming more proof that the bible is wrong, and eventually there will be no religion.

2007-08-09 02:08:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Just by throwing this out there we make it an issue for those without faith. Those of us who do believe will continue to do so. This only adds to the fire that Satan gladly wants to see burn even higher. Talk is great among those who use there brains with the wisdom God also gave them. Many fall short on this matter and write a check their mouth can't fill due to their unseen God and the faith they lack.

2007-08-09 03:18:56 · answer #6 · answered by Healing_Rain 4 · 0 1

Science is ALL ABOUT changing! Thats why people believe in it. Thats why its objective. Thats why its more honest. Science never pretends to be absolutely certain, but shows how there is "greater certainty" in certain ideas than others.

So hurray for new evidence to increase our depth of knowledge. Even if it is contradictory to existing evidence, at the moment. And those of you who preach absolute certainty in the form of your little book? Keep believing. If it makes you happy.

2007-08-09 02:08:03 · answer #7 · answered by Menon R 4 · 5 0

The article certainly shows that the"evolution" theory is so full of holes , it`s pathetic !

Even though they admit that , they attempt to defend the ridiculous theory by saying it shouldn`t be considered as evidence that "evolution" is a fairy tale .

What a crock ! It`s like telling you that although "evolution" has no basis in fact , and more and more evidence over the years indicates it`s a complete fabrication , you should still believe it because the "educated" archaeologists "say you should"

BTW .......... I`d like to see Gandalf`s "overwhelming evidence" . That`s a fairy tale in itself ! There has never been "overwhelming evidence" of evolution . Also , what "evidence" there is has either been proven to be manufactured , as in the case of "Piltdown man" , or doesn`t stand up to scientific scrutiny as real evidence would .

That`s "overwhelming" ???? . LOL . Show us some "evidence" of evolution that has been absolutely PROVEN to be true Gandalf !!

2007-08-09 02:16:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

First the creation museum and now this. Evolution has been set back for 6,000 years. Or is that 6 million. I guess it depends on which scientist you talk to.

2007-08-09 02:10:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I guess you missed this part of the article. Obviously you read your Bible with the same thoroughness.

"This is not questioning the idea at all of evolution; it is refining some of the specific points," Anton said. "This is a great example of what science does and religion doesn't do. It's a continuous self-testing process."

2007-08-09 02:06:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 9 1

"This is not questioning the idea at all of evolution; it is refining some of the specific points," Anton said. "This is a great example of what science does and religion doesn't do. It's a continous self-testing process."

2007-08-09 02:06:40 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 8 0

fedest.com, questions and answers