One thing I still havent ever gotten...?

Question

The 9/11 attackers were mostly from saudi I think. Trained and supported by afghans... Why do ya'll still think Iraq had something to do with 9/11? I mean I have a dvd recording of bush stating that iraq had nothing to do with it but you still think they did? I dont get it, where ya getting that info from?

But... I mean it was right outa gwb's mouth. On the tv he said it flat out they didnt have nothin to do with it... yet the neocons on here still throw it around like it was proven fact.

I dont get it

Jon- I am not a lib and you can get a new question when you answer this one. I didnt say anywhere in here that bush lied. Actually I said he told the truth but... whatever.

Hercules- I recorded him speaking at a press conference.

Answer 1

Ok, for the last time. WE DON'T THINK IRAQ ATTACKED US. They WERE, however, proven to be harboring terrorists from al-Qaeda and the Taliban (obviously). We are at war IN Iraq, not WITH Iraq. There is a major difference. We are ON IRAQ'S SIDE!

Seriously though, show me ONE, all I'm asking for is one solitary, question or statement where us "neocons" have said Iraq is responsible for 9/11.

Answer 2

The media flooded that both Iraq had something to do with 9/11 and that Iraq didn't have anything to do with 9/11.

The excessive amount of propaganda is one reason why America is so divided.

Edit:

"But... I mean it was right outa gwb's mouth. On the tv he said it flat out they didnt have nothin to do with it... yet the neocons on here still throw it around like it was proven fact."

Yes, but everyday we also hear that if we didn't go into Iraq then we would be fighting the terrorists in the U.S.. This has came out of GWB's mouth multiple times, the same as Iraq having nothing to do with 9/11.

The American populace is being played. Half realize it, while the other half don't.

Answer 3

The attacks were carried out by al-quada.
Al-quada was created by the former VP of Iraq.

The War in Iraq is not called the 9/11 Vengeance War.
It is called the Global War on Terrorism. Terrorism did not begin in 2001.

Answer 4

The best case result of the Iraq war would be to give the US bases in the region to replace the ones in Saudi. The removal of US forces from Saudi has been under reported to say the least.

Answer 5

Once again, another lib complaining about how Bush Lied and Iraq was a peaceful fun loving country before Emperor Bush launched is attacks.

Can we get a new question?

EDIT::

Tools such as myself have been conditioned by continuous unpatriotic ignorance surrounding the Iraq war. Bush was correct in his statement that Iraq did not directly send men to bring down the 2 towers. However; they had again become an undeniable threat to the middle east and world. WMD's would be in Saddam's murderous hand by now, he would be terrorizing the world and he would be killing more of his own people. The war, when we win (and we will win), will be looked on as a brilliant move to stifle terrorism and bring democracy (or the Arab form of a government run by the people) to the middle east.

Answer 6

Iraq financed terrorism including those who perpetrated 9/11.

Answer 7

erm u know. the media is unreliable but its up to u to decide wats rite n wrong. U may nid to know where the dvd comes from, frm whos perspectives is it told, whose the target audience of this dvd.. etc.... there is alot to hide in tis world, there is no truth..

Answer 8

if i had a nickel for every time i hear a left wing lunatic ask that question, i'd be rich...if i had a nickel for every republican that said "iraq had somthing to do with 911", i would be broke...i don't get you.