English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We use to have big battle cruiser in WW2 and the last ship that was used in the war in Gulf War was the USS. Minnesota.

Has the larg battle cruisers been replaced with heavy aircraft carriers?

Why don't we have them anymore?

2007-08-08 15:40:07 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

10 answers

Because those hugely expensive big lumbering battle cruisers and the even bigger battleships were nothing but very heavy gun platforms that haven't fought any sea battles since early in WWII. Today light weight missles that don't require a heavy platform have far more range, accuracy and punch than any gun. And missles from the other side, if they get through, can take the big boys out.

2007-08-08 15:46:04 · answer #1 · answered by Mike1942f 7 · 4 0

Actually, the Navy had only two battlecruisers: USS Alaska (CB 1) and USS Guam (CB 2). They were classified as "large cruisers", what other navies would call battlecruisers. Alaska and Guam were not kept in service long; they were decommisioned soon after the end of the Second World War and broken up in 1961.

Battleships were being phased out by the end of the Second World War and no battleships have been built since then. The Iowa class were the last built and ever brought back from mothballs several times. However, battleships are very expensive to maintain and all four Iowas were decommissioned in the 1990s.

2007-08-08 16:14:36 · answer #2 · answered by wichitaor1 7 · 1 0

In a word, air power. Naval battles are decided between fighter planes, missiles and bombers. The classic gun battles of World War I and II have given way to air attacks and missile barrages which can be launched from outside the range of naval guns.

2007-08-08 15:44:52 · answer #3 · answered by deopressolibernow 2 · 2 0

Yes, air power has supplanted naval gunnery in battles on the open sea.

Of course, there haven't exactly been a lot of naval battle since WWII, so that 60-year-old paradigm may be due for a shake-up. You never know.

2007-08-08 15:45:43 · answer #4 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0 0

It was the USS Missouri (Iowa class), now a museum at Pearl Harbor.

The USS Minnesota was sold for scrap in 1924.

2007-08-08 15:55:05 · answer #5 · answered by bleacherbrat34 6 · 1 0

two things at lease, their guns had become very inaccurate compared to the missile, the other major one is the problem of how to hide the signature of a large boat on the water, very difficult to hide so basically the large ships are sitting ducks with today's technology

2007-08-08 16:09:18 · answer #6 · answered by goz1111 7 · 0 0

They have been replaced. We don't have them anymore because air force is so much more powerful. Aircraft carriers are never attacked because of their high tech defense system.

2007-08-08 15:50:55 · answer #7 · answered by matt14.pats 2 · 0 0

Mainly its because they don't need big cruisers any more. They use rocket launchers, like Aegis class ships...they'll take out a cruiser any day.

2007-08-08 15:44:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It's called, "Guided Missile Destroyer" and a much more advanced platform for modern weapons.

2007-08-09 02:37:48 · answer #9 · answered by Steel Rain 7 · 0 0

air power has made them outmoded

so your answer is correct - carriers have replaced battleships

2007-08-08 15:46:49 · answer #10 · answered by roadrunner426440 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers