I've asked before, but am interrested in different personal understandings, and there's lots of those so far.
2007-08-08 12:51:26 · 17 answers · asked by hog b 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Unfortunately I fell you will have a very sorry crop af answers to choose from.
That Dr.dino cat is funny, that site is almost as good as answersingenisis.
2007-08-08 12:57:35 · answer #1 · answered by Gawdless Heathen 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
the assumption of evolution under no circumstances addresses the "secret" of the human concepts. it somewhat is an argument - "what's the concepts?" - that has plagued guy since Plato's "Thaetetus.". The human concepts can purely be defined poetically. For Plato, the human concepts is an aviary. each concept is nearly a fowl escaping from the aviary. As a Christian, i've got self assurance that guy became into created in corresponding to God. that would not propose God has anon - metaphysical chimp, and so on. visual charm. by using made in "his image,". Scripture is touching on thoughtfulness. A considerate God made one creature in his image: present day guy, a being alive with the two a ethical sense, and a feeling of the divine. So, i'm (a million)the two an unintended results of Lucy walking upright, out of the primordial woodland, on the best time; or (2) a considerate, living being with a feeling of precise and incorrect. i've got self assurance, admittedly, in the archaeological record: the astrolipithicene, and so on. How can one completely deny the fossil record? although, Darwin. /. And. the scientists that have accompanied have stumbled. Onto a great locate: the actual evidence of God's. introduction. yet, the human. concepts. nonetheless remains a secret. Left. To. The. truthful, poets, and. Philosophers. (. Wittgenstein, Aquinas, and. Dostoyevsky, and so on. The. theory of. evolution. Ignores. The. secret.
2016-10-09 15:09:16 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolutionists, please could you demonstrate your understanding of what PROVING a theory is?
Creationists don't care about Evolution theory. It is irrelevant.
Darwin's evolutionary theory suggests how time changes animal species, which could be true with or without God.
This evolutionary theory has NO evidence that God does not exist, but atheists love to read that into Darwin's (amost religious) theory.
If God used evolution, so what? Christians are certain monkeys did not evolve into evolutionists!!!
Since we're devoid of the atheist's NEED to believe in this "theory" Christians question the so-called "proofs".
How can any sane person "believe" that nothing turned into everything without a Creator?!?
This is a stretch for my faith, so how do "atheists" find enough FAITH to believe this UNBELIEVABLE so-called theory???
It seems more like a new anti-God religion!!!
Time and time again, "the missing link" was claimed to be found, with much fan-fare, by one searcher or another, then (quietly) debunked.
If there is currently a so-called "missing link" between mankind and our "monkey uncles", we don't care to "believe" in it.
We'll just wait until it gets debunked AGAIN and replaced with another non-proof!
It will likely be debunked later, and another "proof" foisted on the scientific community, which quickly covers up past missing-link debunked claims (so their position is believed by chldren force fed this theory in school)!
2007-08-08 13:16:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
macro or micro ?
big bang theory suggests just that . big explosion , after millions of years the earth and , planets and stars are ( and still being ) made . Not far off from the bible , God " spoke "
life into existence . could have had the same effect .
More of a drastic turn is the Earth . Then again not really . Most people don't understand that there was life and God wiped it out and re -created the world in 6 days ( literal days )
2007-08-08 13:03:16 · answer #4 · answered by Suicide642 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It is the idea that all the life on earth has evolved, through small adaptations, from lower life forms, and is not created but here never the less. These adaptations are due to helpful traits being retained through "natural selection" and unnecessary or harmful ones being dropped. That is my nutshell version of the evolution hypothesis.
2007-08-08 12:59:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution is the way that people who denied God and his creation has to explain how the things exist. My question for you is. If the Evolution is real why the scientist can create another world like this with the condition to live. Of course their no gonna be happen because just one creator is God. Just in case tell to the evolutionists to take his own raw material to create not God raw material. Have peace God love you and the evolutionist event when all of them denied him. God is a winner.
2007-08-08 13:17:53 · answer #6 · answered by Jack Jack 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I understand the theory of evolution--I recommend reading Darwinism Refuted.com--Go there and see what Scientists have to say. There is to much data that is abused. Again the theory according to Scientists, is overrated
2007-08-08 13:06:33 · answer #7 · answered by j.wisdom 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The idea is that things (due to mutations and survival rules) change over time to become more equippiedto handle their current enviroment!
2007-08-08 12:59:33 · answer #8 · answered by J.C. H 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Creationists + knowledge?
2007-08-08 12:55:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They don't understand it. If they did, they would not be creationists, since evolution is now a proven fact.
2007-08-08 12:56:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋