Is Evolution in opposition to Scripture?

Question

Given the needed phenomena and implications of the Theory of Evolution, would you say that it attacks the foundations of Christianity? If you think it does, please list which Christian concepts evolution challenges and how. If you think it doesn't, explain how the idea evolution and the ideas Christianity could possibly coexist in harmony.

I have not given my stance on this issue, so please do not waste space by ridiculing my question. Inquisition is one way by which one may attain knowledge that he does not already have. Care to share what you know?

Answer 1

I don't believe it does as none of us know how God creates. Evolution could be the method He uses .I personally feel for life to take eons to evolve is more of a creation.

Answer 2

The Catholic Church, among others, has argued that you can believe the truths that science reveals and still be a Christian. Evolution does not conflict with theism, it does not conflict with Christianity, it only conflicts with a certain literalist reading of the Bible.
Millions of Christians and Jews accept the scientific findings of a Universe billions of years old and accept that life has evolved since it first appeared. They do not read Genesis as saying literally that the earth was created within the last 10,000 years and that all animals were created at once just as they appear today. Fundamentalist sects of each of these religions, though, reject science because it disagrees with their reading that the universe is young.

Science and religion can coexist. I'm not a Christian, but Christians who focus on the Bible's teachings about God's love and salvation have no problem accepting science. Those who try to misuse the Bible as a science text have to reject scientific findings from geology, paleontology, cosmology, physics and many other fields of modern science.

Answer 3

The very reason for evolutions existence is to demonstrate a model for creation without a Creator. Since it was invented to explain an assumption (creation without a Creator), why would anyone who puts any credibility in the Bible even consider it?

Evolution is not based on observation. It certainly is NOT evident in what we can observe. There is no mechanism, let alone, direction (other than blind chance) for evolution. If evolution actually occurred, has it stopped, or is it still happening? If it stopped, what caused it to stop? If it is still in operation, why don't we see creatures that are half way developed into some new species?

If humans and apes had a common ancestor, why are apes still in the trees, whereas we've gone to the moon?

The Bible says that death is a result of sin. Evolution says that death had been going on for millions of years before humans arrived on the scene. Genesis says that each kind reproduced its own kind, evolution says that a species can evolve into another. Genesis says that the first man named all of the animals. Evolution says that most of them were extinct before humans arrived. So who is correct, God or Charles Darwin?

Answer 4

Gen a million:24 And God suggested, enable the earth carry on the living creature after his type, livestock, and creeping ingredient, and beast of the earth after his type: and it became into so. This verse says that the earth delivered the living creature into actuality, yet is this saying, actually manifesting out of the climate. Or is it which potential the rigidity of each species on the different. This scripture ought to be saying the two. The earth is made up of aspects and is likewise a antagonistic ecosystem it somewhat is desperate up for the animal kingdom to offer and proceed a species. our surroundings would necessitate some adaption. The question is, does a species have a God given potential to regulate bodily to proceed to exist in a slowly changing ecosystem. If this occurs over millenium, the assumption is, then why do practitioners of technological expertise think of that precise genetic differences would be made in one era. possibly a species that got here under rigidity ought to offer indicators that could facilitate replace in the actual. it somewhat is a trend a christian would desire to maintain on with to locate God and immortality. Being uncomfortable in very own psychological ecosystem to set off and be lead right into a metamorphosis of concepts and coronary heart. God contraptions a trend as an occasion on many stages.

Answer 5

Evolution denies God as Creator.
It posits that given enough time and chance life "just happened" and all living things evolved into the forms we see today.

It denies that man, created in the image of God, is any different(except for being more "evolved") than any other animal.
I believe that we have a Creator to whom we are morally obligated to and to whom all will give an account to.

I believe that men are eternal creatures and are souls that have a body and when our body dies our soul goes on.

We also have a conscience given to us as a moral governor to tell right from wrong.

I know there are theistic evolutionists, but I believe the bible record is completely accurate and that evolution and Christianity are not compatible.

I know the bible is true because God has forgiven my sins by His only begotten Son, Jesus, and I
have a very real and loving relationship with God.

He truly does all things well, and the creation, though flawed due to sin, still is a wonderful testament to the power of God.

Answer 6

Though I think Young Earth Christians are off their proverbial rocker in a lot of ways, I do think they are making the most sense within the confines of their relgion.

Why? I'll tell ya.

There's a geneaology in the Bible. It starts with Adam, and continues on right up to Jesus.

In order for Jesus to qualify as the Messiah in keeping with Messianic prophecy, he had to be descended from David. Therefore, the lineage must be a real, literal lineage, not a "figurative" one.

At what point does that lineage become literal, and cease to be figurative? Does it become literal with Abraham? Noah? David? When?

Square-peg beliefs simply don't fit easily into the round holes of reality. If your beliefs require somersaults in logic, that's a sign that something's not right.

For more about the Genesis story and science, have a look here...

http://www.generationterrorists.com/quotes/genesis_revisited.html

Answer 7

i suppose in some ways evolution is in opposition to scripture, but no more than scripture is in opposition to scripture (for example the first two chapters of genesis).

if you think the foundations of christianity include the idea that god created each species individually, miraculously from nothing, then yeah evolution would contradict that.

modern theologians such as john haught have devised ingenious ways of reconciling all these contradictions which of course most people ignore, maybe because they just like the idea of a god who regularly dabbles in human affairs, or perhaps because the mental gymnastics involved seem a little contrived.

Answer 8

I don't believe it does, Josias. I could probably write a book about it, but suffice it to say that Genesis answers the question in a mindset of its time -- without science, without astronomy, without evolutionary biology. It describes a process of creation (not necessarily a single event) and describes the process in a period of time. It also attempts to answer fundamental theological and philosophical questions about who we are and why we are here, which really is the main point of the Scripture anyway.

Scientists speak in terms we can today understand; the ancients spoke in terms they understood. Both are not necessarily contradictory IF we are willing to listen to them both. Unfortunately, most of us are too busy shouting to hear anything...

Answer 9

There simply is not enough room here to elaborate. But it starts with the concept that the bible suggests that homo sapien has existed for but six thousand years and goes on and on from there.

Answer 10

No. Genesis implies a progression of life. Only a literal reading in in conflict with reality.