I'm wondering because they keep posting that yahoo article that very clearly states that it does NOT disprove evolution and swearing that it does.....You guys are making yourselves look bad. Stop
2007-08-08 10:09:42 · 20 answers · asked by ~Heathen Princess~ 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Doppler that is just science. Science isn't about disproving the bible. Science has helped in many a religous finding thank you very much. NOTHING is 100%. Nothing at all. It's not tap dancing.
2007-08-08 10:15:42 · update #1
Creationists making themselves look bad?
That's a redundant statement.
2007-08-08 10:12:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 10⤊ 1⤋
See, I come to R&S, I have a good time, offer my answers, feel pretty swell - then you go and ask a question that I have NO IDEA what it means. LOL Young Earth Creationists - who are they? The one's who think Earth is 2007 yrs old (someone actually said they believed this a day or so ago, NO LIE).
I think the earth is 4.5 billion years old - that's old, right?
Keep up these braintwisting questions - it's nice to take a pause from the Cat antics and really try to think.
(((dghtrofisis)))
2007-08-08 17:14:49 · answer #2 · answered by Marvelissa VT 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not as young as I used to be, but I do consider myself a creationist. I haven't read the article you speak of, but I don't usually try to prove something that requires faith, with science.
Just remember, the ability to read and the ability to comprehend what you're reading are two entirely different things.
2007-08-08 17:16:05 · answer #3 · answered by Tonya in TX - Duck 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
‘The interpretation of evolution is in a state of upheaval: the rapid advancement of Molecular Biology has led into question many of the tenets of Darwinism and neo-Darwinism which, although valuable approaches at the time they were formulated, never fulfilled the criteria demanded by real scientific theories… In the author’s opinion, no real theory of evolution can be formulated at present.’
From the publishers’ advertising of a recent evolutionary book, Evolution Without Selection, by A. Lima-de Faria, Esevier Science publishing Co. Inc., New York (NY) USA, 1988 372 pages.
2007-08-08 17:14:22 · answer #4 · answered by Derek B 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
*sigh*
Well, I *was* wondering what to do with this half-gallon of Sailor Jerry Spiced Navy Rum in the cupboard . . . guess I'll stay on R&S and get blotto!
Buck up, lil' camper! Forward Ho!!!
2007-08-08 17:16:50 · answer #5 · answered by Boar's Heart 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes they can read - but only REALLY simple things. Anything over a second graders head is out of the question.
2007-08-08 17:12:08 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I've answered it 6 or 7 times so far. I'm going to start drinking and get really nasty at 20.
2007-08-08 17:11:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
I think the point they're trying to make is that evolution, which so many claim has been proven as fact, is itself continually evolving. A fact cannot evolve. It either is or is not. The point they're trying to make is that evolutionists have to keep tap dancing and changing their theroy to keep up with evidence that proves wrong that which they said was absoultely right the day before. "It's like this:" "No, wait, it's like this:" "Oops, it's like *this*:"
2007-08-08 17:13:37 · answer #8 · answered by doppler 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
It does not matter. You obviously overlook the facts and are prejudice against christians. I`ve been in your camp for years and probably know more about evolution then you. I`ve studied both so don`t assume were all the same.
2007-08-08 17:13:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
people see what they choose to , we are our worst enemies of the factual truth , we have an infinite capability to decieve our very own selves. thus demonstrated
2007-08-08 17:13:15 · answer #10 · answered by matt culling 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋