English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

So what makes me say that?
Well besides the fact that he wants to halt LEGAL immigration, the other day is said that he wanted to bomb Mecca in retaliation . Are you kidding me?If anything that would cause moderate Muslims to hate the US. And lord knows what it would cause the the radical Muslims to do.

source:http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/04/tancredo-bomb-muslim-holy-sites-first/

2007-08-08 09:22:17 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Immigration

edit: I clearly said that he wanted to it it in retaliation. But I guess you don't like reading the entire question huh?

Oh and Julia I just reported you for not answering the question. If you get a violation email you know who's it's from =)

2007-08-08 10:16:22 · update #1

yes yes Dirty keep telling yourself that

I won't believe anything you tell me unless you site your sources. Which you have yet to do.
Cheers!
he's polling at less than 5%

=)

2007-08-08 10:41:01 · update #2

Ah Dirty that I was a lil uncalled for but.....I'll only say this
when some one resorts to name calling you know you've won the argument

2007-08-08 10:47:44 · update #3

flawed logic?
your logic makes no sense
you call me crazy then you get made when I call him crazy?
another case of selective outrage

2007-08-08 11:10:57 · update #4

edit: mad*

2007-08-08 11:11:30 · update #5

toe crap report me all you want
you have to have a reason to report me

and I haven't violated any of the community guidelines

nice try though

2007-08-08 11:13:05 · update #6

ahhh Dirty have you checked the dates to your sources?
it's 2007
not 2006
I could email you 20 other polls taken within 3 months that say the opposite

(pwned =) )

2007-08-08 11:17:54 · update #7

22 answers

I agree. He freaks me out- big time. Crazy is not cool..... And, he is frighteningly so. I think that if he were (by some scary fluke of nature) to be elected to the presidency, that he may be the one to bring around World War 3, and, potentially the end of days (in the bible). I am only slightly exaggerating, because if he were to "bomb" mecca, we would be engaged in a world war that may end us all.

Luckily, he has no chance, so, he can just crawl back home to the hole he lives in..........

2007-08-08 10:09:08 · answer #1 · answered by Amanda h 5 · 5 10

Is Tom Tancredo crazy...hmm I'd say he is out of touch quite a lot..in reality he's just trying to "stir the pot" to gain some votes among the Republican base, but the guy is "way out there" if you know what I mean, for the moderates and especially more liberal people. I don't know whether he seriously thinks legal immigration is bad, in fact, it's quite a good thing because they also bring in business and labor. Did you know the founder of Ebay is an immigrant? This is what I mean. Tancredo is not considering the fact that most Americans are not reproducing like they use to...considering that fact if we do not let in any immigrants or too little we will stifle our economy, why do you think that other developed countries are letting in immigrants as well? It's not because they are "good hearted" or the such..it's good for the economy. On his view of bombing Mecca, he is totally nuts and ignorant. Terrorists are just like any other extremists that are just a small fraction of the population. If he bombs Mecca he wouldn't just piss off the extremists, he'd also anger the rest of the Muslim population. It's like if I said the Catholic church should be eradicated because of what a couple of priests did..you see what I mean?..that's the reason why Tancredo will never have my vote..and the reason most Americans will never vote for him if he runs for president.

2007-08-08 13:54:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Mr. Tancredos approach, is the blue print for what should be done. There are some sections I am not really very keen on. But for the most part. Absolutely. As a Law Enforcement Officer who has to deal with the Illegal problem, Tom offers some very direct and workable solutions to daily problems. For some of your responders to offer rants in the manner they did. These are the type of people that I wind up fighting with daily. Liberal crying and whining machines. Who either are involved in making money off of Illegals, or they are making a pay check from the Social Services end of the mess. I have handled 7 Homicides involving Illegals. The hoops we had to jump through to seek a justice path for the victim was everything short of absurd. Every wet towel lib, laid stumbling blocks at our feet. To protect the perpatrators of these crimes. But in the long run, they lacked the resolve and resources to go the distance on the cases. From the US State Dept. To The Federal DOC. You could virtually wind up slamming your head in your squad car door, and feeling much much better. Under Tancredos doctrine, a lot of the problems we faced, would be eliminated.

2016-05-17 08:08:26 · answer #3 · answered by hermine 3 · 0 0

No we can't ALL agree that he is crazy. Heck my family of three can't ALL agree on what to have for dinner....much less 300 million Americans.

Clearly there is a large populace in the great state of Colorado who disagree with you. He's been elected to Congress from there five times. Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if someone from Colorado posted a question that said "Cant we all agree that Spazz is crazy"? because they disagree with your post. (But I'd answer no to that question too)!

Polling at 5% doesnt mean people think he's crazy...just that he isn't electable. Sorry, two different things!

The majority of the US citizens agree with him on illegal immigration.

A Rassmussen Reports Poll taken from June 11-12, 2007 of 800 likely voters found that:
69% support an immigration bill that focuses exclusively on reducing illegal immigration and enforcing the borders

2007-08-08 10:35:58 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 4 3

I read that a poster here reported you.

Technically you ARE in violation of the guidelines.

It is against the policy to "chat" on this site.

It is strictly a "question and answer" format.

I have received violations for the EXACT same thing. If you want to chat, argue, or debate with those answering your questions, there are sites for this very purpose. This is not one of them. "Toe" is right.

P.S. Many people on here create "ghost" accounts to pursue those that pis* them off to get their accounts deleted. It is very easy to do this. Nearly everyone "technically" violates guidelines and anyone with half a brain can bypass "blocks" and report you for nearly every question and answer you have. It's best to BE NICE, don't get arrogant and think you are "invincible" or "smarter" than anyone else.

2007-08-08 11:21:46 · answer #5 · answered by ProUSA2 6 · 2 3

NO I don't agree he's crazy.

You have been reported also, Spazz.

"owned."

If you don't know what for, read the guidelines, as summermoondancer advised another poster, or ask her, she is now intimately aware of what constitutes a violation due to personal experience.

2007-08-08 10:59:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

he wants a bigger and more deadly war, and for more people to hate us. HELL NO. Tancredo for president, NEVER. He's not even close for normal people to consider him as a future president.

edit. . .

people are mad, wow. they are not saying nice things. I think they can't admit to themselves that Tancredo will NEVER become president. ha ha ha. Hillary or Obama YES!!


edit . . . . . .

"Flash"-- If you have to stalk me and answer some of my other questions by calling me stupid, that goes to show who you are, you can't face the truth, and only cowards to that.

2007-08-08 11:06:38 · answer #7 · answered by rmon 6 · 3 5

Tancredo should be pres. Immigration, legal & illegal, is out of control. We need to take our country back. Immigration divides us because it dilutes our sovereignty. We are a nation of too many cultural loyalties. And yes, getting serious about this battle with radicals may involve tough talk. We don't always need to be the good guys.

2007-08-08 09:38:41 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 8 7

Muslims all over the world already attack Christian sites and Muslim holy places as well if the attacking Muslim faction doesn't subscribe to that particular temple's belief.
I have no problem with what he said-
If you want something to inspire outrage-google Beslan- the Muslims were responsible for that
http://blog.acton.org/index.html?/archives/929-The-School-Attack-on-Beslan.html
http://www.esquire.com/features/ESQ0606BESLAN_140
Or Google 911 attacks- that is enough to make my blood boil

I got no problem with what Tom says as long as they throw the 1st punch- I say leave them in the dust.

That link below gives some more details about what Muslims are capable of-

2007-08-08 09:46:12 · answer #9 · answered by tnfarmgirl 6 · 6 7

Actually, he didn't say it the other day. Years ago, when a talk show host asked him 'exactly how' could the US 'get tough' with radical terrorist groups without country affiliation, he said that we could tell them we would bomb Mecca if they did anything.

Obviously, that would have been the best recruitment fodder the jihadists ever had had, but it was said in that context. Still stupid.

Do you have a candidate to suggest who has never said anything stupid?

2007-08-08 09:35:52 · answer #10 · answered by DAR 7 · 10 7

He may be crazy, but what do you term the people who vote for him.

2007-08-08 10:13:46 · answer #11 · answered by Zombie Birdhouse 7 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers