2007-08-08 09:08:39 · 16 answers · asked by The Church Lady 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Must have been put in the ground by... oh I don't know....
Maybe SATAN
2007-08-08 09:11:11 · answer #1 · answered by ɹɐǝɟsuɐs Blessed Cheese Maker 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, it's funny how the evidence supports the theory.
Now maybe you can answer this one for me, why is it that people like you only attack evolution? The bible says nothing of quantum mechanics or relativity, but I've yet to see a question posted trying to debunk those 'wacky' theories. You people know that your feeble minds can't possibly grasp these theories so you lash out at one that seems like an easy target. It's too bad that you fail to grasp, even to the slightest extent, the theory of evolution. You really think your pathetic mind with all its faulty logic could possibly argue against evolution? You couldn't even contemplate why your car gets hot when it's parked in the sun, much less produce a single coherent argument against evolution. Maybe you should just go watch your favorite documentary series, The Flintstones.
2007-08-08 16:26:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's even more convenient that the fossils collected before Darwin published also support evolution.
2007-08-08 16:16:31 · answer #3 · answered by novangelis 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No it is not convenient, scientists are not out to prove evolution. Science doesn't have an agenda, they are only interested in the truth.
Creationists on the other hand do have an agenda; they want to prove that the Bible is true. Creationists are the ones that find convenient "evidence" not the other way around.
2007-08-08 16:11:46 · answer #4 · answered by Daisy Indigo 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, they DON'T support evolution. Just because you find some bones in the dirt DOESN'T automatically mean that they had parents or children different from themselves. You don't even know if they had ANY offspring. All you know is that it DIED.
The presence of fossils can just as easily support the fact that they were buried in a worldwide FLOOD. In fact, almost all fossils, except those found in amber and precious metals, are found in SEDIMENTARY ROCK. As in, FLOOD SEDIMENT. Also, fossils can only be formed if they are BURIED QUICKLY. They cannot form if they just rot on the surface for "millions of years" and the scavengers scatter their bones.
2007-08-08 16:14:36 · answer #5 · answered by FUNdie 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, what is convenient is that they say that these fossils are ansestors to animals or things of today. What's even better is that people believe it. (Note the sarcassam)
2007-08-08 16:17:17 · answer #6 · answered by pippenintheshire 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Church Lady, you is SO wise, gullfriend. Juss like those doctors that keep finding all these diseases and stuff, juss so you can pay them to cure you? How SPECIAL is that, I askya?
2007-08-08 16:17:40 · answer #7 · answered by Acorn 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, the more they study evolution, the more they get confused and find things that change their whole way of thinking- kinda like God sets them up with something they think is great and then WHAM! He throws out something new that makes it obsolete.
If God ain't gigglin', I sure am!
2007-08-08 16:15:36 · answer #8 · answered by glen w 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
hm, never thought about that before...
maybe the creationists should go find something to support their theory
2007-08-08 16:12:25 · answer #9 · answered by azelle.badelle 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, it just happens to disprove evolution. Its proves that there was a flood.
2007-08-08 16:12:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋